>>161361

It is however, a correct statement on it's face. And how do we know for sure that they are not our friends at this point, after doing what they did, at the request of our previous govt. Should they have said no? Absolutely. Are we even sure that it wasn't done as a rogue sector of their own?

>>161398

I may actually be, sure enough. And for that ask forgiveness, it isn't a slide. What did I actually miss? The memo?

there is much discussion today regarding Q's post and GB. I wasn't being a jackass. If he an TM have a better "realationship," why is it not possible they are raking out their own too.

Regarding GB's inability to stand down on Assange, they have a lot to lose. And I am not entirely convinced the US government is going to treat him right either. Not at this time. I WANT them to, but so far, not convinced we are playing fair. The president only has so much power in the government the way we are built. Anyway, you can be a dick if you like, but maybe someone else will tell me what I missed in the last three thre>>161398

ads of REEEE Soros and the beat down shills, etc. We are loaded with Tom Foolery today. After reviewing all your posts this thread, you basically seem like a dick that comments on others with no input. So fuck off, royally and have a wonderful evening.

>>161489

They are not going to touch this with a ten foot pole unless it's to bash us. It would risk everything Q is doing. It is not time yet. Though it was a very tongue and cheek nod to the groups that is for sure.

>>161519

Dude, the only time I leave these boards is to drop off kids and pick them up from school. I shit you not. I stay until very early in the AM too. I'm no fan of British intelligence, nor even of 5E, hell, I don't even really like the NSA even though I know people that work for all of them and their various shell subsidiaries.

I know that the Queen and her fam are not inert like some people think, and I know that knowledge is power and they all hold a lot of "knowledge." The problems in our FBI/DOJ/CIA are exposed at this point, toward a globalist/Soros/Clinton sell out, that we may never have known about, except in groups like this. I guess I'm just trying to understand if you think that GB, that voted for Brexit for the most part and want their pwn pride back, like we do, are not our friends and why it's inconceivable that they wouldn't do us a solid.

>>161527

> TP annotates it could be P not C. Would love to know who the redactions are and in what context the text was written. Juicy!

>>161746

I am very familiar with the J's. No worries there. Loyola is no place I would send my kids, for instance.

Also to clarify, I never mean the people of a place, but their leadership, in this context. Too many are suppressed by minority operators who think they know better. And they dumb the people down to reinforce that.

>>161792

Oh if only Infinity would do the same. To be paid to post in any form, pro or con should be a bootable offense. I don't want an advertisement.

>>161804

Look back through archives. The entire book was scanned in at one point.

>>162015

Money Laundering… Who was arrested on that day?

>>161996

read the texts… still no emails, still no memos. But it is getting clearer that something was going on. That is for sure. They will eventually need a day or thirty in court, but yeah… getting interesting. Salvos from R's over the D's bow.

>>162063

bumpy rides. Those are usually Station C-12s. used for short commutes where driving isn't feasable.

Now I know Fox is watching us. Martha just practically quoted me verbatim from earlier about following them! lol. To funny.

>>162153

either Money Laundering or Major league. Who was arrested on that day?