Last Bread I posted about like timestamps of @RealDJT tweets on consecutive days. I think this is significant. Initially I only thought there was one set of days that this occurred; however, I've gone back over the spreadsheet throughly. It has happened 5x since Q started.

I may be way off here but I think it's significant. I'm posting the same timestamps here to see if anything jumps out at the autists here. It may be nothing but thought I'd share.

12-18 03:23

12-19 03:23

05-31 06:18

06-01 06:18

03-13 07:37

03-14 07:37

01-09 15:07

01-10 15:07

1-16 15:19

1-17 15:19

>>1613912

Oops-additional consecutive days like timestamp

>>1613929

I agree that it can not be a coincidence. I'm not an autist though…just an accountant so can't spot the 'secret'

>>1613944

Autist-anon do you think that the date lineup of the group might be significant?

1, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 31-Days

1, 1, 3, 5, 6, 12-Months

>>1613963

It's driving me nuts too…it is obviously intentional of POTUS. Hopefully someday we'll be able to ask him.

>>1614107

OK, the 5th pic of tweets I had to add on separate post.

>>1614108

Another thing that I think is intentional by POTUS and wished the heck I could figure out is the 0 deltas (4 consecutive zero deltas) on the dates of 4/17 and 5/25

4/17/18 timestamp of 5:24 AM

5/25/18 timestamp of 5:04 AM

>>1614165

Here are the 4/17/18 @RealDJT tweets all with the same timestamps.

>>1614202

They had to have been pre-prepared and then zapped out all within one minute.

Here is the 2nd group of @RealDJT tweets with 4 consecutive same timestamps of 05:04 on 5/25/18

>>1614224

They weren't in a thread though. They were all separate tweets not connected to one another.

>>1614223

They weren't in a thread. They were all posted separately.

>>1614196

Well, I asked the clock anon if he/she had a clock template without the blue Q spots as I was going to plot DJT tweets to see if anything jumped out at me. I've not been able to find the clock anon or get them to answer. I've asked a few times.

>>1614270

I think he had to have been using two separate devices at least as I don't think it's possible to post that much in one minute timeframe.

>>1614285

That anon is probably higher than a kite…disregard rudeness!

>>1614211

Anon, you are so darned good. I bet you have something here.

BAKER

This anon might have connected the same timestamps on consecutive day tweets by @RealDJT

>>1613912