>>1614525

Violence leads to chaos.

Chaos leads to innocents becoming victims.

In a struggle of this scope, collateral damage is unacceptable.

Had you made the effort to read all the Q drops, you would have come to these same conclusions.

Even more obvious is the tact utilized by POTUS.

[1] Return to the rule of law.

[2] Justice.

[3] Negotiation from a position of strength.

[4] The Art Of The Deal.

So when you see 'No Deals', don't read into this what your feelings tell you.

Rather, comprehend that POTUS / Q+ are employing executing the plan according to the [4] guiding principles listed here.

>>1614603

In that attack, Amalek came from behind. This is obvious from other passages where it's clearly stated that:

[1] the cloud / pillar of fire protected the Israelites.

[2] the attack occured duing the day when they were moving

[2] when a group that large there are bound to be stragglers.

[4] people who had committed certain types of sins were removed from within the camp.

[5] certain people will always fall behind when groups of people move forward. These are the elderly, infirm, children.

Rational conclusion:

Amalek could not attack the Israelites because of the protection provided by the cloud / pillar of fire, therefore they had to attack from behind the moving group where the stragglers would fall outside the group and so be vulnerable.

This means that Amalek are cowards who attack from behind and not face to face.

It also means that they are ruthless and have no moral qualms killing defenseless children and elderly.

And for those that would say that God should have protected them the answer is that those that 'exiled' themselves by committing sins that they knew would force them to remain outside the camp until atonement was completed did this to themselves.

This group of people would still attract others within the group to accompany them, especially children who's very nature is founded on curiosity, the desire to learn and experience life.

There would also be others who would have to bring them food water and other supplies.

Conclusion:

The attack from the rear exposes two key elements of the Amalekites.

Ruthlessness and Cowardice. These are the very traits of the cabal today. They operate in secret because they're cowards and they're ruthless because of who their victims are and the methods they use to gain control of the weak.

>>1614734

If we take into consideration that Amalek is the embodiment of evil, then we can go back to the very first story about evil, the snake.

The snake went to the woman and used a rational argument to turn her away from the path. The cunning here is two-fold.

[1] Women operate primarily on an emotional base. This is biologically necessary because they have to interpret the need of newborns based on emotional signals from the child. Remember, the infant hasn't the ability of speech to convey it's needs and the mother must provide those needs. This is simple logic.

So the snake's argument is you can be like God if you eat from the fruit of the tree that confers to you the Knowledge Of Good And Evil. She responds with an emotional desire to be like God and forgets that She was created in Gods Image, so she is ALREADY like God.

[2] The snake, being the coward that he is, will not confront Adam, but he knows that if he can cause Eve to fall, she will cause Adam to fall.

Now Adam.

Adam was lonely, so God separated the Woman from Adams own flesh. Eve is his complement. They function together as a unit. So when Eve comes to him with this idea to eat this fruit now, Adam is forced to react emotionally, not rationally. Remember, Eve is there to relieve his loneliness and he doesn't want to alienate her, so he too falls.

The snake is using what tactic here?

Is this not pitting one against the other?

What does the cabal do to cause unrest within society?

What do they do to cause wars?

>>1614742

Yes.

>>1614759

>There's vibe to this line y'all.

The vibe is there within all human beings. No need to be a part of some organized religion to understand what's going on.

That book, though, has some very well thought out lessons to be learned by all of us.

>>1614843

>Snake corrupts women (like with feminism) to take Adam out of Eden (a properly working society) and plunge him into Hell.

When the Progressives came to America around the turn of the 20th century, this was the first thing on the agenda. In a properly working family, both the husband and the wife have to be on the same page. This is just simple logic. By giving women the right to vote they laid the groundwork for D&C within the family.

Let me be clear.

I am not saying they shouldn't have that right nor am I advocating removing that right.

What I'm getting at is something way deeper. The right to vote is just the foundation for D&C.

Remember what Killery said recently about Conservative women. She 'claimed' that they vote conservative because they are 'forced' to do so by their husbands and male children. The implication being that women can and should vote DIFFERENTLY from their husbands.

While it's true that women CAN vote differently from their husbands, why would they WANT to?

And even if they did, doesn't that mean that, for all intents and purposes, that means that the home is divided? If the husband has one 'ideal' and the woman has the 'opposite ideal', how can they live together and raise a family properly? Wouldn't that cause the children to be ar the very least 'conflicted' as to how to behave and what to aspire to? And, at worst, wouldn't that force the children to take either one side or the other? How is that a viable and successful strategy for building a family?

Killery betrays her true intentions, those of the cabal, in that statement. The destruction of the family unit.

Women can vote as they please. They don't need failed political and morally corrupt 'role models' to instruct them.

>>1614885

>Nachash has the root of "shining one," so the symbol could be a golden snake.

I hope you're not implying that I agree with this. My response the other day was that this may or may not be correct, IIRC.

What I remember saying is that the 'shake' symbol can be found in many places.

My favorite 'snake' is the one that's trapped in the talons of the eagle on some American emblems.

Eagles are best known for their excellent eyesight, they 'see' the evil in the shake.

On the other side of the spectrum, there's the snake symbolism that's found in some very shady places. We all know what those are.

I also just had an interesting thought. Why would the cabal use an owl as a symbol?

And I've concluded that this is because an owl 'sees', has excellent vision at night. They operate under the cover of darkness when others are 'blind'.

Sound right?

>>1614925

'shake' should be 'snake' both times.

>>1614996

Women have the same intellectual capacity as men. It's the fact that emotions will sometimes override the intellect that shapes the 'form' of the attack on women.

Look at Sarah Sanders as the perfect example of an intelligent woman.

Her mind is more than suitable to rival any of the men that badger her with their 'soyboi' 'beta-male' stupidity.

Watch the video at the 12:58 mark.

Pay attention to her response to the child asking the question in this press briefing.

Now , ask yourself this question:

If the same question had been asked by an adult male in the room, would she have cried?

Why did they get this child to ask that question?

Did she answer the question properly anyway?

The simple solution to the problem we face in society is to educate our children based on who they are. We must fight to prevent the schools from providing our children with confusing messages about gender, career choices, what their role is in society, etc.

>>1615054

>>1615077

Anon, this bot is known to switch IP's at the drop of a hat. I've seen it use as many as three different IP's within the same bread.

The amount of time, effort and vigilance to repeatedly ban just this one bot would take precious time away from those that have the ability to do this.

And what would happen if , as has been known to happen frequently, three or more bots are spamming and you also have live shills thrown in to boot?

Get comfy.

Use the tactic of 'goes in one ear, out the other'. IOW, filter.

>>1615139

Will you ever contribute something to the digs?

Will you ever create a meme that contributes in the struggle to spread the truth?

Do you ever pray that Good should prevail over evil sooner rather than later?

Do you have the will power and conviction to succeed?

>>1615169

As far as I know, BO didn't fail the Turing test, you did.

I called you out on it.

You ignored me.

Here's a rundown for the anons that weren't there:

Your response to BO when he explained the censoring issue was well reasoned and AI would have been unable to provide such a response to your badgering.

Your response was irrational and would have / can be seen as 'failing the Turing test"

I pointed that out.

I'm not that concerned with your babble and now that I know who you are, it'll be simple to know what to do.

Thank you for playing, loser.

>>1615202

>>1615169

I like your memes, BTW.

Mine are more appropriate.