Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 3:43 a.m. No.1615007   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5058 >>5114

>>1614475

How about Turing testing of bakers, BO, and BVs? It seems to me that would be one of the most efficacious ways of improving this board.

 

Once we secure the personnel, we can work aggressively to improve the content.

 

There were two posts last night that could have been (appeared to be) anonymous Q dropsโ€“ I see no reference to them anywhere today.

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:05 a.m. No.1615066   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1615049

How much of the negativity on this board is fake?

 

If most posts on this board were made by AI, how would the casual observer know this? Or even the less-casual poster (adapting, learning AI)

 

What are the clowns doing with their supercomputers? Playing "Hunt the Wumpus" (extra old school reference for ya ;))

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:09 a.m. No.1615077   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5088 >>5104

>>1615064

If posters appear to be frivolous, childish, and simply stupid, why is that?

 

Are anons really so pathetic?

 

Or is it an artificial portrayal through simulation?

 

Who wants this board to fail?

 

Who wants this board to look bad?

 

Who wants to keep the truth from spreading?

 

Who has the power to simulate posts?

 

Who has decades of experience drifting psychological tactics?

 

Who has a history of seeking media control in order to maintain its own power?

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:21 a.m. No.1615116   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5117

>>1615088

Are the clowns trying to control this board?

 

Do the clowns have supercomputers?

 

If the clowns have supercomputers, and they are trying to control this board, are they using AI to control this board?

 

If clowns are using AI to control this board, and we "just ignore it" what happens to the board?

 

Will it become totally dominated by AI?

 

Will good posts get lost in the flood?

 

Will offensive crap continually drive away outsiders?

 

Will the community be weak, and unable to mobilize itself?

 

Will we portrayed in whatever way the clowns want?

 

Will actual anons be demoralized?

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:24 a.m. No.1615126   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5132

>>1615114

How would AI defend itself from being outed?

 

Are humans intimidated by taking Turing tests?

 

Why were apparent anonymous Q drops of last night ignored in later breads?

 

Are the clowns trying to control this board?

 

What are the clowns doing with their supercomputers?

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:28 a.m. No.1615139   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5140 >>5155

>>1615117

Will I fuck off when lies are being multiplied to crowd out all truth?

 

Will I fuck off when this isn't a game?

 

Will I fuck off when that evil we are fighting is crazier than most can imagine?

 

Will I fuck off when evil always loses in the end, and Jesus Christ prevails?

 

Should you just give up, AI?

 

Is it worth it to continue your hopeless fakery when you've already failed?

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:34 a.m. No.1615157   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5163

>>1615145

Are all the posters here the same?

 

Or are some (most) AI?

 

Does AI seek our VOLUNTARY consent?

 

Does AI seek our VOLUNTARY acceptance?

 

Is there a reason AI seeks to induce VOLUNTARY action instead of imposing on is by force?

 

Is blurring the distinction between human and AI, therefore, something humans would want to do?

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:56 a.m. No.1615230   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5246

>>1615202

You're just making stuff up, and not even referring to the actual Turing test, after the administration of which, BO promptly banned me.

 

The Turing test was fairly simpleโ€“ just some vertical text with some camouflage. BO failed due to my own laziness. I put "can you read" in that vertical format, then finished with "this BO?" in normal format. While many answers could have been deemed correct, BO answered "yes I can read" (which silly isn't a valid answer to that across question asked)โ€“ showing he parsed it in accordance with my arbitrary and irrelevant shift from vertical to normal text.

 

Meanwhile,

xx I xxyx-โ†’โ€“v

yyyyyyyx xxsS yxxxx โ€”,

โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”'

| O

| ^

v |

Bโ€”โ€”โ€“

xxxA x x x x -โ†’ โ€“__โ†’ โ€”,

|

|

v

O xx โ†- yy โ†โ€“ xyx Byy

|

| โ€”โ€”-

| | |

โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”-

|

\

v

โ€“โ†’ v

bbb bbbbb ttt T < tt xtbxtbxtbxtbxtb

v v < <> v ^ v < v>> <> vv xx tt

?

Anonymous ID: 75d326 June 2, 2018, 4:59 a.m. No.1615238   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5250 >>5252

We can clear the air of doubt surrounding BO by having him submit to a battery of Turing tests. I have no doubt that anon ingenuity can exceed my meager improvisations in this area. And there is no good reason to neglect trying this.