https://twitter.com/k_ovfefe2/status/1518593013206982657?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
Various conservative comments on Twitter and ActuallyBarron
B@ActuaIIyBarron·5h
Donald Trump Talked To Elon Musk This Morning.
https://twitter.com/ActuaIIyBarron/status/1518577924521275392?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
If BIG, this would be TRUE!
https://twitter.com/ActuaIIyBarron/status/1518657406359769091?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
https://twitter.com/blantdaddy3/status/1518369357906296834?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1518581040440569856?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
Mark Levin was always a sleeper cell, imo, he called us communists and marxists a couple of weeks ago if we didn't agree Ukraine should be a war with Russia.
It's interesting to see who the "supposedly Trump supporters" are taking money from MIC
https://twitter.com/emeriticus/status/1518433461555634176?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
A lot of Happy Patriotic Americans on Twitter today!
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1518567824779845637?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
Elon Musk ruthlessly cleaned house of any Tesla workers who disagreed or got in his way, a new book says
Grace Kay and Tim Levin
Aug 3, 2021, 1:23 PM
Good news anons, he won’t have a problem firing people, kek
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has denied allegations in the past that he has a propensity for rage firing people, but a new book tells a different story.
"Power Play: Tesla, Elon Musk, and the Bet of the Century," by The Wall Street Journal's Tim Higgins details numerous instances when the CEO appeared to fire employees and contractors out of sheer anger.
The book, released on Tuesday, reveals that Musk developed an atmosphere of fear at Tesla — an environment where the billionaire had a reputation for exploding at top executives and employees on the assembly line alike.
In 2006, ahead of Tesla's first Roadster reveal party, Musk had his head of marketing Jessica Switzer, as well as a public relations firm, ousted because he was unhappy with Switzer's decision to spend money on marketing. Higgins said Musk thought his name alone would be enough to incite interest in the vehicle.
Shortly after the executive's departure, Musk threatened to fire another PR which was later hired to take on the Roadster reveal, citing his anger over a New York Times story on Tesla that did not mention Musk.
"I was incredibly insulted and embarrassed by the NY Times article," Musk emailed the firm. "If anything like this happens again, please consider [your] relationship with Tesla to end immediately upon publication of such a piece."
Mark Goldberg, a Morgan Stanley banker that helped take Tesla public in 2010, told Higgins that Musk repeatedly threatened to fire bankers from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs before Tesla's IPO launch in 2010.
"I don't have time for this," Elon Musk reportedly yelled during an episode. "I've got to launch the f-- rocket!"
Musk's fury caused several executives to leave the company, Higgins said. Peter Rawlinson, the executive leading the development of the Model S, left Tesla after a series of spats with Musk. Musk put pressure on CFO Deepak Ahuja and Rawlinson's key deputy Nick Sampson to bring Rawlinson back to the company. When they couldn't, Musk fired Sampson in a fit.
Later, Tesla found itself without the heads of its manufacturing department ahead of the Tesla Model 3 launch due to Musk's ire. The CEO went into a rage during a factory visit over issues with the Model X's window. When a worker on the assembly line proposed a solution, Musk lit into the worker's manager.
"This is totally unacceptable that you had a person working in your factory that knows the solution and you don't even know that," Musk reportedly said before firing the head of the factory….
Portnoy says Business Insider is a gossip rag, that report stories to smear people, I think it's true.
https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-elon-musk-ruthlessly-fired-anyone-who-disagreed-spacex-report-2021-8
Michael Caputo's life was ruined what Dan Jones and the Dems did.
https://twitter.com/MichaelRCaputo/status/1518418647512932352?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
Caputo, a former Trump campaign adviser, delivered this statement to the committee on Tuesday, May 1, 2018:
'Your investigation and others into the allegations of Trump campaign collusion with Russia are costing my family a great deal of money – more than $125,000 - and making a visceral impact on my children.
'Here’s how I know: how many of you know Daniel Jones, former Senate Intelligence staffer for Senator Dianne Feinstein? Great guy, right? Most of you worked with him. One of you probably just talked to him this morning.
'Of course, very few of us in flyover country knew Daniel until recently. Now we know that he quit his job with your Senate committee not long ago to raise $50 million from ten rich Democrats to finance more work on the FusionGPS Russian dossier. The one the FBI used to get a FISA warrant and intimidate President Donald Trump, without anyone admitting until months after it was deployed that it was paid for by Hillary Clinton.
'In fact, good old Dan has been raising and spending millions to confirm the unconfirmable – and, of course, to keep all his old intel colleagues up-to-speed on what FusionGPS and British and Russian spies have found. Got to keep that Russia story in the news.
'Of course Dan’s in touch with you guys. We know from the news that he’s been briefing Senator Mark Warner, vice chairman of this committee. Which one of you works for Senator Warner? Please give Danny my best.
'I saw some of his handiwork just last month. Remember this lede paragraph, from McClatchy on April 13?
'The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
'That’s your pal Dan, isn’t it? He came up with some kind of hollow proof that Michael Cohen was in Prague meeting with Russians when he wasn’t. He tried to sell that to reporters, and they didn’t buy it because it doesn’t check out. So, to get a reporter to write up his line of bull, he gave the documents to the Office of Special Counsel.
'We know that’s likely, because he’s told people he’s briefing investigators.
'So, technically, the special counsel’s office has evidence. Your pal Dan gave them more of the Democrats’ dossier, funded by more Democrats, provided again by Russian and British spies. Information no reporter would write up, but now there’s an angle: the Special Counsel has it. Now it’s a story.
'It’s a clever but effective ruse. That’s a story, just like when reporter Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News wrote this gem on September 16, 2016:
'“…U.S. officials have since received intelligence reports that during that same three-day trip, Page met with Igor Sechin, a longtime Putin associate … a well-placed Western intelligence source tells Yahoo News. That meeting, if confirmed, is viewed as especially problematic by U.S. officials…”
'Dozens of stories were written from the Isikoff piece, doing real damage to the Trump campaign. Of course, now we know Isikoff’s reference to “intelligence reports” was just him renaming a dossier funded by Democrats and dug up by his longtime pal Glenn Simpson and some foreign spies. Once Simpson gave his Clinton campaign opposition research to the feds, it was news.
'This was especially true after Isikoff intentionally labeled the campaign materials as intelligence – just like McClatchy called Dan’s information “evidence.”
'But who is McClatchy’s second source? It couldn’t be Dan; he was the first source. It couldn’t be Simpson; he works for Dan. It can’t be the Mueller investigation; they kicked the McClatchy story to the curb with aplomb. So who could it be – perhaps one of his former Senate Intelligence colleagues? I mean, you’re all in this together. You’re the swamp.
'What America needs is an investigation of the investigators. I want to know who is paying for the spies’ work and coordinating this attack on President Donald Trump? I want to know who Dan Jones is talking to across the investigations – from the FBI, to the Southern District of New York, to the OSC, to the Department of Justice, to Congress
.
'Forget about all the death threats against my family. I want to know who cost us so much money, who crushed our kids, who forced us out of our home, all because you lost an election.
'I want to know because God Damn you to Hell.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/fb-5682671/amp/TRUMP-AIDE-MICHAEL-CAPUTOS-SHOCKING-STATEMENT-SENATE-INTEL-COMMITTEE.html
>'Of course, very few of us in flyover country knew Daniel until recently. Now we know that he quit his job with your Senate committee not long ago to raise $50 million from ten rich Democrats to finance more work on the FusionGPS Russian dossier. The one the FBI used to get a FISA warrant and intimidate President Donald Trump, without anyone admitting until months after it was deployed that it was paid for by Hillary Clinton.
>
I'm pretty sure Dan Jones is on Durham's list.
This poster is a researcher, but worked with all the other researchers below, and found a lot of information in the materials released, but I suspect he did some public research. Very interesting.
God said “Let there be light”
@MichaelRCaputo·17hReplying to
@FOOL_NELSON@TrustIsEarndand
@mindnotforrent
On 5-1-18 I blasted Senate Intel Committee Dems for working with Dan Jones.
And this is why Michael Caputo is really happy, Dagon from Georgia Tech was in communication and probably funded by Daniel Jones (the one Michael was screaming at the Senate about).
Margot Cleveland had retweeted Michael's tweet:
So it's pretty clear from this documentation Durham is very aware of Dan Jones and Senate Committee that set up this hoax.
https://twitter.com/mindnotforrent/status/1518258395152891907?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs
chillax,the whole process is going to speed up dramatically after he proves the conspiracy with HRC and all those that submitted a pleading, Sussman is low hanging fruit, but Durham and team have the whole conspiracy mapped out. When Sussman is charged it's going to be easy dominoes. Durham expected all these objections, and wanted them to know all their plans (Kash said its a tactic) while he is not exposing what the team knows.
Remember they were also looking for information about Ukraine & UK
I'm excited for the first time….I've read all the court documents, Durham's team are masters in what they do and say.
This is huge, that's why Michael Caputo is so freaking happy.
Look what I found from the Sullivan testimony to Congress, he was interviewed in 2017, and was already planning a media campaign before the 2018 and 2020 elections.
Plus they had many, many organizations still investigating or working on ways to frame Trump at the time of the interview, outside dark money groups
https://republicans-intelligence.house.gov/reports-and-letters/russia-investigation-witness-transcripts.htm
I meant to post this one too
I meant to post this one too>>16151959