Tick tock
Tick bot
xx I xxyx-→–v
yyyyyyyx xxsS yxxxx —,
———————————'
| O
| ^
v |
B——–
xxxA x x x x -→ –__→ —,
|
:
|
|
v
O xx ←- yy ←– xyx Byy
|
| ——-
| | |
—————-
|
\
v
–→ v
bbb bbbbb ttt T < tt xtbxtbxtbxtbxtb
v v < <> v ^ v < v>> <> vv xx tt
?
>>1615255 (lb)
BAKER
Please add to notables with note indicating consistent pattern of inexplicable hostility to Turing testing.
Merci ami.
>>1615230 (lb)
bakey bake
This perhaps needs a look for notables.
Grassy ass hombre
xx I xxyx-→–v
yyyyyyyx xxsS yxxxx —,
———————————'
| O
| ^
v |
B——–
xxxA x x x x -→ –__→ —,
|
|
:
|
v
O xx ←- yy ←– xyx Byy
|
| ——-
| | |
—————-
|
\
v
–→ v
bbb bbbbb ttt T < tt xtbxtbxtbxtbxtb
v v < <> v ^ v < v>> <> vv xx tt
?
You mean, BO?
What is "real" life isn't the question at this moment.
Can it spread itself?
Can it emulate and derail?
Can it have extraordinarily powerful effects on discourse?
Those are the questions– and I imagine most humans get it, easily.
So should we implement Turing tests? Are you scared of them? Why or why not?