>>16154348 (/lb)

Especially when the game consists of who are harmed more and who harmed less when the TRUTH is exposed to the world.

One side appears to have accumulated power and influence through tricking the world to accept the outputs of an INCONSISTENT SYSTEM.

Any inconsistent system, i.e. any system that can by its axioms and theorems output two mutually exclusive contradictory statements, is 'capable' of outputting ANY statement as 'proved' no matter how ridiculous.

Durham's approach is genius.

Focusing on how the criminal nwo, and all their assets who infiltrated government and media, have INTRODUCED INCONSISTENCIES INTO THE SOCIAL SYSTEM, in other words they knowingly introduced false information, deception, into the institutions of government.

That logic has the ability to sequence jump ALLLLLL the way up the nwo's chain of command, because anywhere orders are made to introduce deception, are themselves parties to introduction of deception.

We don't need to be limited to 'who pulled the trigger.

We can "hop" all the way to the top of the chain of command where the 'Great Deceivers' are originating all the deception.

Nothing can stop a process that consumes all attempts to stop it.

>>16154400

"wE mUsT sToP dEcLaS eXpOsuRe bY tRiCkInG aS mAnY oF oUr oWn foLLoWeRs aS pOsSiBlE iNtO bELiEviNg tHeY aRe 'fIgHtInG aGaiNSt DiSiNfOrMaTiOn"

Dumb fuck Hillary and Obama.

Is anyone liatening? Kek

>>16154414

Nice try division shill.

>>16154410

Musk: "I've decided to undelete everyone's deleted Tweets".

>>16154423

Or maybe Musk was a double agent all along.

>>16154364

>Q has said Elon Musk was selling tech to North Korea and Iran,

Q never wrote that.

Q560 does not state that.

It's like watching a cat toying with a terrified mouse.

This isn't even fair.

>>16154446

Read Capitalism by George Reisman.

Best treatise on economics ever written.

>>16154482

Nah, that's what someone who depends on deception and censorship of truth would threaten.

If it can be destroyed by the truth IT DESERVES TO BE DESTROYED.

>>16154491

99% of the movies and shows on Netflix and Prime Video have 'stories' that denigrate fathers as abandoners or abusers.

Anon knows the script writers are intentionally spewing code that viewers are to subconsciously associate with a hatred of the creative Father, God.

Every time the cult writers tell a story of an anti-hero who the viewers are supposed to be mesmorized with, almost all whenever their fathers are mentioned, it's almost always "My dad was horrible".

They view Earth as a place of exile, a world 'cut off' from God, where they are abandoned, and abused by the cruelties of life.

That logic is given a 'pop culture' op mockingbird narrative of portraying fathers as in the first place by and large bad and hopeless, and it's up to everyone to 'DiSpRoVe' that contrived dialectic, where any answer is an ideological capturing and agreement with the rules of the dialectic of 'accept bad father or else you're denying bad father. Denier denier!'

>>16154528

This racist POS is going to pay for smearing, slandering and defaming Rittenhouse.

And since when was it OK for a non-Jew to appropriate a Jewish last name?

Who really 'owns' this 'actress'?

Now that Durham has exposed how the Democrats used ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE as a means to conceal their criminal activity, I can't wait for Durham to start exposing how the criminals also used MARRIAGE as well.

Then RELIGION.

>>16154598

Look at how that panicking narcissistic Rothschild bastard is trying to make their personal problems everyone else's problem.

"Waaaaaah, they say mean things about me on 8kun. EVERYONE STOP THEIR LIVES, THIS IS EVERYONE'S PROBLEM NOW!"

>>16154612

Imagine Musk was sued by Durham.

Imagine it went through the courts.

Imagine an alternative timeline where Musk was found guilty of embezzlement, and his punishment was to pay $44 billion fine, with a B. And, Twitter was still controlled by pedo Jack.

It would be the biggest fine any one person ever paid in human history.

The world would go apeshit at first, but almost everyone would agree that there was a form of justice.

Now ask yourself, what's the difference between that timeline and this one?

The difference is that all their Twitter are now belong to us.

>>16154659

Not all, just those INDIVIDUAL Rothschilds who committed crimes where the punishment is being 'zapped'.

Innocent until proven guilty.

We must want that for those who disagree with us for the same exact reason we must want their freedom of speech, for they are requirements of PROTECTING THE GOOD.

Those who seek to blanket condemn a single person as guilty for nothing but a last name, are as evil as they accuse others of being.

Can't defeat evil by joining it, Lucifer.

>>16154621

>>16154674

I don't read "Poso"

>>16154677

Then what?

Trump said Musk is a good man.

Anon trusts Trump more than Anon post smears about those Trump says are good men.

If Trump told Anon to jump off a bridge, Anon wouldn't. But you knew that anyway.

>>16154686

Some are so intellectually and morally bankrupt they believe 'how cute' doesn't give them away as a neckbeard virgin shill.

Kek

>>16154731

As opposed to…

Is anyone else getting Q code vibes in these Durham filings?

>>16154767

Ok, Michael PR.

>>16154771

>your buddies

>your guys

We're all anons.

Can't divide anon.

Anon is singular consciousness.

Indivisible.

Ideas are what matter here, not names or faces of the sources.

Anon saw a very weird sudden shift in the Twitter Board's response to Musk.

It was all fuck no, fuck you, we'll dilute the shares, you're an enemy, on and on and on…

Then all of a sudden the Board said yes.

Anon believes Q declassified some intelligence behind the scenes and 'forced' the real controllers out which their puppets in the board quickly followed orders as if to get this over with quickly.

Nunes mentioned 'miracle'.

>>16154808

Gotcha, neckbeard virgin who has no clue how old fucks even talk but thinks he does because he saw a couple of old people on Netflix.

>>16154827

Q did say these people are stupid.

kek

>>16154840

Durham is SHREDDING the defendant's shitshow claims to hide evidence.

Calls them out as the psychologically projecting psychopathas they are.

>>16154847

Correct, they're doing it themselves so much everyone sees it now.

>>16154881

Anon guesses white hats knew Trump Advisor-1 was being spied on, so they sent him to Moscow as a honey pot.

>>16154890

Anon guesses Schiff and No Name

Oh my God these people are completely fucking retarded.

This is masterwork, Anons.

I am witnessing stunning control over anticipating the defendant's playbook.

>>16154920

>>16154931

Yeah here

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60390583/97/united-states-v-sussmann/

This part made me LOL

"these are internal, open source research drafts, as agreed, pls treat this as background/not for attribution.as you’ll see it’s all easily replicated anyway."

After spreading the disinformation to the media, and doing so as if to boast how successful they were in NOT 'keeping the information secret/privileged', the fucking morons are now all claiming the information is privileged lawyer client comms.

Bwahahahahaha these people are all fucked.

Fooked.

They're so fooked.

Top kek Durham

>>16154966

Hitler was a puppet of the NWO you stupid groomer.

To say Hitler was right is to say his (((handlers))) were right.

Fucking morons, you're all going to be annihilated from your own contradictory garbage.

>>16154995

Plants need water?

https://qagg.news/siteimages/truth108196643754917172.png

>>16155067

>WW3

Nope.

"In his remarks, Minnekayev cited the strategic value of the region, claiming “control over the south of Ukraine is another exit into Transnistria, where there are also facts pointing to the oppression of the Russian-speaking population.” Transnistria is a separatist region of Moldova — comprised primarily of Russian speakers — akin to Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine, which has been autonomously run by a pro-Russian faction since 1990."

>>16155080

Whoa good catch.

Looks like the 'to' transported from the footnote to the text.

>>16155097

Or the "to" is a typo of "do".

td

A missing "to" in the footnote…

td

to