"Life has the objective of overcoming the confusion, when you are manifesting the antithesis of the energetic magnetic life, whether it be you or I. But not in a struggle to death, which in fact it is… what I want to say is, not in a war as you are accustomed to on the Earth. The struggle is inside, to create virtues and to correct defects.
I told you before, that life in itself as a principle is an electromagnetic state of memory. Very well, when you are born in that memory, you come as a concentrated collection of knowledge which you later 'discover' by inertia. To create a balanced aspect in your life is your true struggle. You will have to raise one grade of intelligence to a grade such that your memory will serve to prolong your survival. Because in your world they survive… struggling against the feelings and the qualities. Thus is initiated the true battle, within oneself."
"Love it is the same love that converts a hurricane to a light breeze and provides the rains that wash all the stains from the soul. Love is what makes possible the saturation of beings on the planet, the love that survives in the tempests of an angry sea."
"Bayesian probability
Is one interpretation of the concept of probability. The Bayesian interpretation of probability can be seen as an extension of propositional logic that enables reasoning with hypotheses, i.e., the propositions whose truth or falsity is uncertain.
Bayesian probability belongs to the category of evidential probabilities; to evaluate the probability of a hypothesis, the Bayesian probabilist specifies some prior probability, which is then updated in the light of new, relevant data (evidence). The Bayesian interpretation provides a standard set of procedures and formulae to perform this calculation.
In contrast to interpreting probability as the "frequency" or "propensity" of some phenomenon, Bayesian probability is a quantity that we assign for the purpose of representing a state of knowledge, or a state of belief. In the Bayesian view, a probability is assigned to a hypothesis, whereas under the frequentist view, a hypothesis is typically tested without being assigned a probability.
The term "Bayesian" refers to the 18th century mathematician and theologian Thomas Bayes, who provided the first mathematical treatment of a non-trivial problem of Bayesian inference."
"Our personal beliefs are our world; they help us make sense of things and shape our behaviors. Having them challenged, and potentially weakened, is like having a hallucinogenic experience where our understanding of the world is turned upside down and inside out. This is very frightening to some, especially rationalists who want an organized and structured understanding of the world.
Consciousness is really fragile, and it should be handled with care, It is here in one moment and gone in the next.
The hard problem of consciousness is the question of what consciousness is and why we have consciousness as opposed to being philosophical zombies. The adjective "hard" is to contrast with the "easy" consciousness problem, which seeks to explain the mechanism of consciousness ("why" versus "how," or final cause versus efficient cause).
The hard problem of consciousness is questioning whether all beings undergo an experience of consciousness rather than questioning the neurological makeup of beings.
I always found the most interesting, and perhaps compelling, idea of consciousness is that it is linguistic awareness.
I think that language made it possible for us to, as Descartes said, to perceive that we perceive."
Revenge is predominantly emotional; justice primarily rational. Revenge is mostly about “acting out” (typically through violence) markedly negative emotions. At its worst, it expresses a hot, overwhelming desire for bloodshed. As perverse as it may seem, there’s actual pleasure experienced in causing others to suffer for the hurt they’ve caused the avenger, or self-perceived victim (cf. the less personal Schadenfreude).
Justice—as logically, legally, and ethically defined—isn’t really about “getting even” or experiencing a spiteful joy in retaliation. Instead, it’s about righting a wrong that most members of society (as opposed to simply the alleged victim) would agree is morally culpable. And the presumably unbiased (i.e., unemotional) moral rightness of such justice is based on cultural or community standards of fairness and equity. Whereas revenge has a certain selfish quality to it, “cool” justice is selfless in that it relies on non-self-interested, established law. At least obliquely, the two quotes below are suggestive:
“But men often mistake killing and revenge for justice. They seldom have the stomach for justice.” ?Robert Jordan
“Social justice cannot be attained by violence. Violence kills what it intends to create.” —Pope John Paul II
Revenge is, by nature, personal; justice is impersonal, impartial, and both a social and legal phenomenon. The driving impetus behind revenge is to get even, to carry out a private vendetta, or to achieve what, subjectively, might be described as personal justice. If successful, the party perceiving itself as gravely injured (though others might not necessarily agree) experiences considerable gratification: their retaliatory goal has been achieved—the other side vanquished, or brought to its knees. Just or not, the avenger feels justified. Their quest for revenge has “re-empowered” them and, from their biased viewpoint, it’s something they’re fully entitled to.
On the other hand, social justice is impersonal. It revolves around moral correction in situations where certain ethical and culturally vital principles have been violated. When justice is successfully meted out, the particular retribution benefits or protects both the individual and society—which can operate effectively only when certain acceptable behavioral guidelines are followed. So, consider:
“Revenge is a kind of wild justice, which the more a man's nature runs to, the more ought law to weed it out.” —Francis Bacon
“Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both.” —Eleanor Roosevelt
“All calls for justice require that victims feel avenged, and revenge is never just if it’s disproportionate.” — Thane Rosenbaum
“Peace is more important than all justice; and peace was not made for the sake of justice, but justice for the sake of peace.” —Martin Luther
-
Revenge is an act of vindictiveness; justice, of vindication.The intense effort to avenge oneself or others can easily become corrupting, morally reducing the avenger’s status to that of the perpetrator. Two wrongs do not make a right and (ethically speaking) never can. Degrading another only ends up further degrading oneself. Even if a kind of justice might be served through an act of revenge, it could still be argued that there’s nothing particularly admirable or evolved in retaliating against a wrong by committing a “like” wrong. Or (to put it more emphatically) to behave vengefully is, at best, to take the low road to justice.
In opposition, justice is grounded in assumptions, conventions, and doctrines having to do with honor, fairness, and virtue. Its purpose really isn’t vindictive. That is, blood thirstiness has no part—or should have no part—in precepts of justice, at least not in the way the term is presently employed. It’s based on established law, and its proceedings are designed to dispense to individuals precisely what is deserved: nothing more, and nothing less.
Revenge is about cycles; justice about closure. Revenge has a way of relentlessly repeating itself (as in interminable feuds, such as the Hatfields and McCoys)—and ever more maliciously at that. Revenge typically begets more revenge. Whether it’s an individual or an entire nation, it takes place within a closed system that seems able to feed on itself indefinitely. Unlike tic-tac-toe, tit for tat is a game without end. One side gets satisfaction, then the other is driven to get its satisfaction, and then… theoretically, ad infinitum. There can be no resolution, no compromise. For each faction (say, Israel and Palestine) has—clan-like—its own agenda, its own sense of right and wrong. And the righteous rigidity of each side usually demands that some trusted outsider intervene if matters are ever to be settled.
"If you believe in the concept of rebirth and that actions in this life can impact one of the following lifes, than the answer must be No, i think.
Even if you don't think of rebirth the answer should be No, because your decisions have impact to events of other events … for example, you go fishing and catch a fish for lunch. This fish is out of the sea and will never return, so it's future and maybe the future of other animals has changed, too.
So this changes exists as long as future exists … as long as time exists … so there is (almost) no expiration date.
-How people treat you is their karma; how you react is yours.
-Karma, when properly understood, is just the mechanics through which consciousness manifests."
"To the permanent part of all of our psyche's, nothing in this life matters, at all, it is all just stupid triviality to something much more important, most of the time. Your silent ruler won't get involved in your divorce, for example, but they'd likely be paying attention would you working on a great literary piece or work in any of the open books in any of the sciences in any of the new understandings that do occur all around us all the time. As an energy based life form; everything is energy based; we are always surrounded by the universe, and, in its' entirety. It is true that one doesn't need read anything first to gain new knowledge, and that by merely accepting what is and being moved by it and moving it where you are able, this thing we call evolution moves, and when it moves, many are made happy, for, moving it is all that can ever be."
le fin.
`-,-{@
--`-, -{@
>`,-{@
>-,-,{@
>–-,-{@
I hope my invest in ……….
whatever.
biden is president……
criminals are free…..
so it was a bad decision.
And I'm broke, single, w/ no teeth………
WHERE IS THAT PROTECTION WORLD WIDE?????????????
I HAVE NO BREAD.
AND IF NOT DRINKING, THEY WILL NOT LET ME SLEEP.
WHAT KIND OF PROTECTION IS THIS, WHEN THEY SMASH MY LEGS TO THE BED FURNITURE, MADE ME BITE MY TONGUE, AND MOAR. LIAR, DEMON.
DO I HAVE A MILLION??????
PEOPLE THAT DON'T EVEN PRAY, GO IN VACATION ALL DAY, WHY NOT ME TOO???????????????
GOD ALLOW BIDEN BE PRESIDENT?
SO FUCK YOU.
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND SATAN????????????
PELOSI "WE SHALL SEE, EATS AT 5 STAR RESTAURANTS"
SO FUCK YOU
I DON'T NEED YOU, I'LL MAKE MY OWN JUSTICE.
LET ME FLY AND GO FUCK YOURSELF.
I WANT TO BE VOYAGER, NOT PART OF THIS SHIT LIE.
I WILL KILL WHOEVER I WANT, TO PROTECT JUSTICE.
so stay the fuck away from me.
I don't want anything from you.
You are evil!
Go away and let me die.
I give no fuck.
But let my memories, cos you're evil that I must to stay away from.
Go, evil.
For eternity!
I gave you my heart and love, and you gave me hell!!!!
Get the fuck out of my life, for eternity!
You turned my life into nightmare, and my house into hell.
I am fucking puke to enter my house, when the night it is coming, i am horrified, and disgusted to look at the sky in the night for you, get the fuck out of my life, evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i don't care if I will die right fucking now, just get the fuck out of my life for ever, 5 years it is enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I play w/ the flies, i kiss my walk in, but you are just evil!!!!!!!!!!!
so fuck you, and all that created you, evil fuck!!!!!!!!!!
take your shit, and vaya con dios, your dios.
my dios will not hurt any of you, if you're good.
5+ OF SHIT LIFE
AFTER 40 OF SHIT
ESPECTING YOU, TO TURN MY LIFE INTO GOOD, AND YOU JUST MADE IT WORST, GET THE FUCK OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LADY Q, DO YOU'RE HAPPY WHEN Q IS FUCKING YOU W/ THE LITTLE TOE, B/C YOU ONLY DESERVE 40%, IN BIGGEST UNCOVER OF TRUTH IN HISTORY?
ANYWAY, HE FOREST.
Elon, have my love.