There really needs to be a comma between Vice President and Kirsten Allen…totally fucked me up for a minute.
Taking this question seriously means the answer lies in how water gets delivered. I mean, municipalities don't just put a multi-faceted hose into a river and siphon water into the homes of the communities. There is a sophisticated infrastructeure that measures and monitors intake, output and separates it from waste for treatment.
It deserves to be looked at, but so far it's all Greek to me. I started here:
https://maps.waterdata.usgs.gov/mapper/index.html
"In the United States, 9 out of 10 people get their water from one of more than 148,000 public water systems."
https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/public/water_sources.html
Providing safe drinking water is a partnership that involves EPA, the states, tribes, water systems, and water system operators. The public drinking water systems regulated by EPA and delegated states and tribes provide drinking water to 90 percent of Americans.
A public water system provides water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances to at least 15 service connections or serves an average of at least 25 people for at least 60 days a year. A public water system may be publicly or privately owned.
There are over 148,000 public water systems in the United States. EPA classifies these water systems according to the number of people they serve, the source of their water, and whether they serve the same customers year-round or on an occasional basis.
https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/information-about-public-water-systems
If the argument is simply that venom would be diluted by the amount of water, then how can that explain the addition of both chlorine and flourine in our water with out diluting?
Think of this as a request to dig.