Anonymous ID: 28c2ca April 26, 2022, 8:24 p.m. No.16161417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1423 >>1431 >>1458 >>1470 >>1490 >>1522 >>1668 >>1676 >>1697 >>1730 >>1750 >>1851 >>1872 >>1878 >>1893 >>1899 >>1904 >>1919 >>2019 >>2094

ALL PB

>>16160818

>Clockfags is Grassley on the clock? He is giving us a clock and a Q+

>>16160834

>Yes

 

>10:10

 

>>16160918

>red carpet

 

>>16160925

>Z

 

>>16161242

>if I gotta bet, the "Z" upon which his laptop is perched suggest "26."

04/26

 

>>16161228

 

 

>2 days ahead of schedule

>today :41

>tweet :43

>clock :42? maybe :41

 

04/26 GrassleyQ&A

04/21 QQ&A

5 day difference = 6 revolutions of 60 mins or 360 degrees (except leap year)

 

Grassley Q with Q&A matches on Q clock minute 36 now. or the current minute 41 if the clock were extended

Anonymous ID: 28c2ca April 26, 2022, 9:08 p.m. No.16161668   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1697 >>1699 >>1716 >>1730 >>1750 >>1767 >>1851 >>1872 >>1878 >>1893 >>1899 >>1904 >>1919 >>2019 >>2094

>>16161417

>>16161490

 

>>16161500

<Okay, what else?

at this point you should just admit you're a tard. and head off to tard jail

 

the Question was, Was Grassley on the Clock today. AND he was.

>>16161490

And you'd have to be a complete retard to not be able to understand that clock >>16161490

but you just want to move the goal posts now.

 

If the clock had been extended another 6 revolutions I would have made my first clock on minute 41. but since I was limited by being on the last turn of my vanilla clock, I had to improvise and count on nontards to comprehend, unlike you.

However, the Q&A 5 min drops >>16161522

supports my clock and further proves you are a tard. hence why you've now dropped the subject and are now filtered.

 

On the bright side, , thanks to you being a total retard, maybe a newfag or two picked up some Clockfag skills

 

Tick Tock motherfuckers