Anonymous ID: 71df66 April 26, 2022, 8:51 p.m. No.16161553   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1558 >>1697 >>1730 >>1750 >>1851 >>1872 >>1878 >>1893 >>1899 >>1904 >>1919 >>2019 >>2094

>>16161486

>Which part was nice?

>And BE SPECIFICโ€ฆ

 

it's a complete picture. there is no "one part"

 

Grassley is holding a Q&A.

The tweet date lines up on the :41 line

The minute marker on his timestamp :43 is 2 days laterโ€ฆ readily inferring that Grassley is holding a Q&A 2 days early.

 

It would be meaningless without the context of #2644, but you know, we're all here in q research gen, so there is an underlying assumption that thte drops are known / understood to a certain extent. "Two days ahead" certainly fits the bill for that.

 

I'm only bothering to respond for the new eyes that aren't familiar yet.

>>16161490

o7