>>16163675

SUDDENLY MUSK IS SINGING A DIFFERENT TUNE REGARDING "FREE SPEECH"

Musk has qualified his much-hyped embrace of “free speech” on Tuesday, his first full day as the platform’s owner, reassuring the world’s governments he will obey their speech restrictions under the reasoning that such officials behave according to the will of the people they govern”—and Musk posted the message: “By “free speech”, I simply mean that which matches the law…I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law…If people want less free speech, they will ask government to pass laws to that effect…Therefore, going beyond the law is contrary to the will of the people”

https://www.rt.com/news/554577-musk-backtracks-free-speech-twitter/

>>16163927

>according to the will of the people they govern"

that's WHY there is a constitution, to protect the minority from the "will of the people."

>>16163962

*OFF

makes more sense now?

>>16163996

>ANY speech is free speech (minus of course anything illegal

sorry, that's merely the top of a slippery slope. who decides what's "illegal" and how far can they go? where are the limits?

CHECKED THE FIRST AMENDMENT, DIDN'T SEE ANY.

>>16163984

someone PLS put america out of her misery. amen.

>>16164049

maybe sheboon has replaced sotomayor (executed at gitmo)?

>>16164064

opinions CANNOT, by DEFINITION, be either correct OR incorrect.

and THAT'S a FACT.

>>16164069