'Most of physical objects accessible to observation, beginning from particles, are “chiral”, that is to say are characterized by “chirality” or “handedness”. In short, handedness is a property that distinguishes a given object from its mirror image. The spatial inversion (P-symmetry) transforms the object to its mirror image by flipping the sign of one, three or (in the general case) uneven number of spatial coordinates. Some of the physical “odd” quantities (e.g. position, force vector, velocity vector, helicity)change upon P-symmetry, wile the other “even” quantities (e.g. mass, energy,s time) remain unchanged.'
'A widely discussed problem in physics sounds: is the parity always preserved? Up to the quite recent times, one supposed that, at the level of fundamental laws, the nature does not distinguish between the right and left handedness. In other words, one supposed that all the fundamental interactions were invariant under P-symmetry. Therefore, the discovery of the parity violation predicted [1] and then detected in experiments [2] became a real surprise. It appeared eventually that nature, in a very narrow domain of weak interactions, is handedness-sensitive.
Logically, there are two ways to restore the lost symmetry, both intensively investigated in the last decades. The first one consists in coupling parity with other fundamental symmetries; exploring this way led to conclusion that, in all probability, only the combined symmetry CPT is always satisfied. The second way (that aims at preserving the parity by itself) postulates the existence of a spatially inverted matter (known as mirror matter or Alice matter) that would represent the handedness opposite to that of ordinary matter. The Alice matter is expected to interact with the ordinary matter through gravity and the photon-mirror photon kinetic mixing interaction. This involves certain observational predictions tested in the ongoing or planned experiments, in particular connected with dark matter theories [3,4].'
when planning counters, we need to include the 'observer' because information war is quantum mayb
kek
hmm now you make me wonder if the mood of the observer affects the (quantam?) system(s)
i suppose it would have to
if mad the observer may gain strength but miss the small things
if cautious the observer is slow but may see the traps
1 observer complicates the entire system (torus strip) so how to navigate with multiple observers (and their moods kek)
strange game, strange Life; it's ok dough
in the END i'm jus glad i got to kick it w the Anons
o7
https://youtu.be/isqu83tCsdc
Red Sonja (1985) - (2/6) - "This is my land, you can't go through here" - Movie Clip
291 views
Sep 23, 2021
>online tool that parses public opinion on certain events to get a footing on the general ratio on current political opinions
prolly not because they had (You) and Frens to help make that clear among other things mayb
kek
ds has the same tools but they have been cheating so long they lost their skill mayb
kek
ah yeah the classic shit post
it's not easy to make Anons smirk and shills seethe w Truth and keks all in 1 post
https://gab.com/wendyrogersaz/posts/108209837240234819
Wendy Rogers (PRO)
Wendy Rogers
@wendyrogersaz
1 m
·
Twitter under Neurolink Elon is fine and all, and I am glad he is trying to be fairer to #MAGA. But once Truth Social goes live and Trump is Truthing on it, it is going to take off. And then we can use Twitter to amplify Truth Social. Pretty simple, really.