directly declare itself to the public. That the movies are recognized as a

 

tremendous propagandist institution is proved by the e~gemess of all sorts

 

of causes to enlist them. There is ample evidence that the Jewish

 

promoters have not overlooked that end of it. This propaganda as at

 

present observed may be described under the following he ad s:

 

It consists in silence about the Jew as an ordinary being. Jews are

 

not shown upon the stage and screen except in unusually fav orable

 

situations. This ill-concealed propaganda of the Jewish movie

 

picture control is also directed against non-Jewish rel ig ions. A

 

Jewish rabbi is never depicted on the screen in any but the most

 

honorable attitude. He is clothed with all the dignity of his office

 

and he is made as impressive as can be. Christian clergymen, as any

 

movie "fan" will readily recall, are often subjected to all sorts of

 

misrepresentation, from the comic to the crim.ina l. This attitude is

 

distinctly Jewish. Like many unlabeled influences in our life, whose

 

sources lead back to Jewish groups, the object is to break down as

 

far as possible all respectful or considerate thought about the clergy.

 

The Catholic clergy very soon made themselves felt in opposition to

 

this abuse of their priestly dignity, and as a result of their vigorous

 

resentment the Jew climbed down. You now never see a priest made light

 

of on the screen. But the Protestant clergyman is still th e elongated ,

 

sniveling, biljous hypocrite of anti-Christian caricatures . He is made to

 

justify his deeds by appeals to " broad" principles-whichre a ll y k ill s two

 

birds with one stone; it degrades the representative of religion in th e eyes

 

of the audience, and at the same time it insidiously in oc ul a te s th e

 

audience with the same dangerous ideas . A Hebrew ma y not be de pi cted

 

on the screen as the owner of a sweet shop-though all sweet shop

 

owners are Jews; but you may make a Christian cl e rg yman any thi ng fro m

 

a seducer to a safecracker-and get away with it. Remembering what is

 

written in the Protocols, a question arises . It is written: