>>16179156 (pb)
>we admitted it and worked to correct.
So he still asserts that banning Trump was the best thing the company could do?
Has @jerk ever admitted that it was wrong to ban Trump?
>We have pretty much not had any rain out west, this winter season. 1 rain last year and that was it.
Since the rain level was so low, Newsom has been releasing more water to the ocean to keep the river habitats.
And they've used money intended for dams on their train to nowhere.
"During the same week of my travels to Nevada, several stories hit the press about the Sites Reservoir. History repeating itself is one way. The Sites Reservoir was proposed in the 1980s, and even after California went through two devasting droughts, one from 2006 to 2010 and the other from 2011 to 2017, the reservoir still hasn’t been built. In November of 2014, the voters approved Proposition 1, a Water Bond intending to infuse our water shortage challenges with $7.12 billion in funding to do infrastructure projects to improve our water supply. Eight years later, there still have been no shovels in the ground to make this happen."
https://sonomafb.org/why-we-should-give-a-dam/
>The Republican lawmaker said the sex was consensual. He later resigned from his elected office.
Madonna is looking pretty rough these days…
>Someone with a voice needs to ask Elon why he bought a company with NO REVENUE STREAM WHATSOEVER for $44 BILLION FUCKING DOLLARS! And while they're at it, they need to demand to know WHERE THAT CUNT'S $17 MILLION SA:ARY comes from!
They'll pay Elon $1 Billion for destroying Twitter. The deal will fall through after the due-diligence is done and fraud exposed.