Anonymous ID: 00db91 June 4, 2018, 7:11 p.m. No.1634817   🗄️.is đź”—kun

i think what is throwing me off the most is the fact that child trafficking isnt like this crazy infrequent thing at the border, and i dont understand why this is being pulled from FB and Twitter and being hit with shills….. to me they have accidentally stumbled into something. otherwise there would be numerous local reports, a few playcating tweets from local reps saying how bad trafficking is yadda yadda…. yet its like all official outlets are treating this like its some wild conspiracy

Anonymous ID: 00db91 June 5, 2018, 5:48 a.m. No.1638347   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8381

so let me get this straight. Some people see hand restraints on trees, and underground chamber that has an entry too small for an adult to squeeze in, with the ground throughout littered with children's toys, porn, lube, and children's food snacks, and bloody children's clothes, bloody buried weapons, a solar light setup and video footage to back this all up as something involved in human trafficking……and the opposition is,"oh this is a normal homeless camp"? yeah me thinks that any opposition to the idea its child trafficking is either because A) you dont want to admit this can happen B) you only believe what is told to you by our ever so trustworthy government and media.

Anonymous ID: 00db91 June 5, 2018, 6:09 a.m. No.1638438   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1638421

Exactly, thank you. There is video of this place, so either its a child trafficking camp of some kind, or a bunch of veterans, who have spent the last few years doing volunteer work to help homeless people spent days on end creating a fake child trafficking camp, which just seems absurd to me, as that is a criminal offense… they would be filing false police reports….

Anonymous ID: 00db91 June 5, 2018, 7:12 a.m. No.1638793   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1638771

rational debate is the main thing that is being coerced these days, as if there was actual discussion, where facts, not opinions, where what mattered, the people behind x,y,z wouldnt be able to continue doing what they do. The facts here are the camp exists, and is covered in kids crap. Either it was staged, or legit, but it exists as there are many many first hand accounts. So the real debate should be is this real or staged? and if it was staged, why would they not arrest the man filing false police reports, and i would even contend this would be tant amount to screaming 'fire' in a crowded theater…. but personally, i think that the odds this were staged are far high than the odds that a vet group combing the streets happened upon a cartel spot, in cartel territory.

Anonymous ID: 00db91 June 5, 2018, 7:25 a.m. No.1638868   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8918

>>1638839

im presuming if you are here, you have seen the video of the inital walk through of the camp, and their claims of it being a child trafficking ring, which was on local news. So ignoring everything else except what was shown in the video, you are presuming its more likely they faked the site, and called the police on themselves, so they all get charged with filing false police reports?

Anonymous ID: 00db91 June 5, 2018, 7:48 a.m. No.1639013   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1638956

I 100% agree with your sentiment, however, i also look at the countless events that have been proven true well after the fact, while during the event, the idea of "well it could be true" was utterly discounted. And aside from the actual evidence (videos thus far), i also look at the coverage. and from where im sitting, i see FB and Twitter actively filtering the info, which requires resources and goals, as well as the general lack of national coverage, when they have no problem reporting small stories like a single person shot by a cop or things of that nature. And seeing as FB/Twitter/MSM all rely on views and audence size, and rarely care about the stories….you would think something going viral they would cover, as to not cover it is to go against the fundamental business model of the broadcasting companies. Would anyone posit a theory as to why this story has been so swept under the rug, which points to it not being true? and im not being sarcastic, lets discuss this, cause i certainly belive there is something going on with the lack of coverage here. what do others think?