Anonymous ID: b9b8fa May 1, 2022, 1:49 p.m. No.16190438   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0529

Progressives Against Progress

 

Just what is it that 'progresses?'

 

Does progress mean to improve or get better? Do we improve? Or does the technology just gain complexity?

 

Originally progress meant a journey. The Royal progress, was a monarch's journey around the realm. Politicians still do this today.

 

Queen Elizabeth the first made a famous progress around her domains in the plague year of 1568.

 

-" The map is part of an atlas known as the Queen Mary Atlas. Mary commissioned the atlas in 1558 from the Portuguese mapmaker Diego Homen. It was probably intended as a gift for Mary’s Catholic husband, King Philip II of Spain. Mary died before the atlas was finished, and after her death, the atlas was presented to Elizabeth I, Mary’s successor to the English throne. The right side of the heraldic shield on the map shows Mary’s coat-of-arms: lions quartering the fleurs-de-lis. Philip’s coat-of-arms, on the left, has been scratched out. The sight of the arms of Catholic Spain emblazoned over England would have infuriated the new Protestant queen. It was well known that Elizabeth had a terrible temper, and she despised Philip. This may well have led her to scrape Philip’s coat-of-arms off the map."

 

The whole of the Court and a large retinue accompanied the Queen on her progress The reasons for the progress were to reduce the costs of Court, show 'Majestie' to the people and to avoid the plague in large cities.

 

.

 

"Scientific progress" is generally understood as 'better'. For a scientific theory that means clearer or deeper, and for a technology more efficient, faster or cheaper. An measurable advantage or benefit.

 

A "progressive" in politics uses social engineering, schools, media content and laws and regulations to make social progress compulsory. 'Progressives' believe human nature is corrupt, bestial, governed by passion, humans are mostly incapable of reason - as many conservatives do.

 

The pedovore cult uses ideologies and fake science to unleash the destructive passions of Mankind. Do you think an unresolved two year public argument about the efficacy of faemask is real and 'organic?'

 

This is an information war the weapons are non physical. None of the puppets or the bullshit NPCs quarrel about is real. The weapons are ideas - our own ideas used against us, or hidden influencers used in subliminal programming of the sleepwalking NPCs.

 

We've been exposed most of us to MSM conditioning from birth. We've been taught the play by the cultist rules, and that the interactive matrix of images and ideas, the prison we've built for ourselves of our own fears, lust and greed. Self deceptive ideologies and the elevation of shamelessness, the promotion of sexual perversions like pedophilia as 'freedom' and the overt occult ritual pervading major public events like the Sportsbowl, and the perpetual confusion of thoughts with emotions are all fostered and encouraged by the dark forces but they are our own.

 

NPCs are constantly encouraged to behave lewdly , to sexualize children, to constantly judge find fault with others, and that someone must be blamed. The passions the cult uses against us are natural, archaic instincts and drives long ago suppressed.

Activated instincts are difficult to resist , impossible many say, without the power of Spirit to resist temptations set before us every day. To make progress ourselves.

 

Communications technology is used to exploit the passions, to "prolong user engagement to infinity, to increase emotional intensity of user interactions, and so to deceive and enslave the unreasoning masses, by indulging our lusts, promoting egotistical quarrels, affirming our prejudices and encouraging our pettiness, jealousy and hatred.

 

Mankind, the cult contends, is a stupid, greedy dangerous animal. Enslaving that beast in an engineered matrix of images and ideas, is the only possible way. MSM media and social networking were engineered with genocide in prospect. Eliminating the ravenous, unthinking masses the superfluous snot-eaters and those who object to the sacrifice of the same is a final objective of mind warfare.

 

That's' what 'progressives' mean by progress.

Anonymous ID: b9b8fa May 1, 2022, 1:57 p.m. No.16190482   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0576

>>16190178

The performance is for people who know JB isn't president - the celbs and White House shills – they're players in the game and forced to play themselves in MIs carefully staged charade exposing their nefarious scams to the horrified Awakening public.

 

Never seen so many sickly uncomfortable grins. May be canine excrement in the canapes.

 

It's a sweet form of justice that NPCs cannot (yet) appreciate.

 

Pedovores and their media protectors are all delivered to justice. None is too rich and powerful, none too poor and obscure, all we be delivered to Justice, not a single one will escape.

Anonymous ID: b9b8fa May 1, 2022, 2:38 p.m. No.16190715   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0786

>>16190653

 

down with a touch of M'butu belly.

Who is Ashley Judd with in the Congo?

 

Martin Surbeck

 

Prior to her accident, the United Nations Goodwill Ambassador regularly visited Congo twice a year, for four to six weeks at a time.Her partner, Martin Surbeck,heads a research camp studying the endangered apes. Judd was out at 4:30 a.m. with two trackers working, which she said is her normal routine there.Jan 5, 2022

 

https://heb.fas.harvard.edu/people/martin-surbeck

 

>My research focusses mainly on questions related to aspects of competition and cooperation within and between groups. I make use of our closest living relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees as referential models, to infer about potential selective pressures and existing predisposition in our evolutionary past. Of particular interest to me is the fascinating social system of bonobos and the question, what selection pressures were responsible to differentiate this species from the better-known chimpanzees.