Anonymous ID: bea021 May 1, 2022, 9:14 p.m. No.16193389   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3390 >>3396 >>3418

>>16193360

BTW, a last little thought before bed…

 

In relation to Q, anons and We the People… I don't think anons and WtP came up short for q to 'give up on'. If a mistake or misstep was made, more likely it was that one single comment about misinformation being necessary. By that alone, everything q said had to be placed in doubt by thinking anons.

Anonymous ID: bea021 May 1, 2022, 9:39 p.m. No.16193470   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>16193418

I just might have understood what you wrote. I may have even speculated a similar interpretation of Q's possible intention while under the watch of enemy Eyes. One way or the other, I do generally agree it's still a bumpy ride ahead yet.

 

Take care, all ya'll anons.

Ganight