>>16194737

hi grampa

>>16194769

The fact that this actually had to be adjudicated means we are not winning.

>>16194803

So…is this a crime or not? I don't fucking understand at this point. Slander at best, right?

>>16194828

>If he aren't winning, then why is the other wide panicking to the point of creating a literal Ministry of Truth?

How is having to go to court to prove you have the right to fly a Christian flag?

>>16194957

>How is having to go to court to prove you have the right to fly a Christian flag winning?

Winning: "Having to go to court to prove you have freedom of expression"