Y might go for a false flag attack as a mass sacrifice
911 was such a sacrificial attack, and for other reasons
what a cute couple they are
if that's hillary, wouldn't you need to put a wooden stake thru it's heart so it doesn't rise up for the mid -terms?
I agree
there have been too many instances of suspected CGI fakery and high tech prosthetic masks with Fauci, Biden, etc
Perhaps the producers of this movie deliberately allow us to see these blatant "mistakes" with ongoing green-screen fakery, etc
We are watching the script play out, moves and countermoves, thrust and parry…
It's fascinating to witness but also frustrating waiting for the finale and end credits
yes, maybe the "movie" has already finished but we are a couple of reels from the finish in our "timeline" for want if a better word
Q alluded that one of the main aims of white hats was to prevent mass human casualties
events are being drip fed to us, and most certainly many more people are wide awake now, compared to 2016, which is great
More shocks and thrills to come, I'm sure!
love the cgi roses in the hedge background
Killary looks a bit pregnant!
maybe she is going to give birth to satan as per rosemary's baby
stew peters show had a dr jane ruby episode recently where a nurse from utah? sent her images of a giant squid like thing that some patient had coughed up
it was frightening and disgusting, like a bigger version of the lil squids in those posts
nothing good will come of the vax, maybe people who took the jab are incubating the mother of all parasites
we could do with a few real life john constantine's right now
Shocking stuff
These people truly are deeply evil, with their abortion bill allowing doctors to kill a baby as it is being born
Infanticide/murder
devil digits, may the holy spirit cast them out
Yes anon, that's the squid creature thing I referred to
Turns my stomach to look at it!
I imagine it's made of the same whitish jelly gunk that morticians are pulling out of the dead vaxxies veins and arteries as they embalm them
john titor is that you, again?