Anonymous ID: 988c3b May 3, 2022, 4:13 p.m. No.16204598   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4654

>>16204556

>You're only going to be upset later if you think the court will really ban Roe v Wade.

astute anon is astute

methinks this is a massive salt-mining op

first they harvest the liberal salt

 

then

when the court comes out with their FINAL opinionโ€ฆ

this one is just a fucking draft

and akchually decide to uphold Roe v Wade

they will harvest the conservative tears

and

if all goes to plan

get a nice juicey conservative false flag out of the deal

Anonymous ID: 988c3b May 3, 2022, 4:25 p.m. No.16204686   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16204654

>They may not be able to pull off another big steal a second time.

if the timeline I have been witnessing continues to play out

 

they will conduct an even bigger steal in 2022

it will be even more obvious

you will be even more of a domestic terrorist for pointing it out

 

at some point after if becomes clear that the dems have "salvaged" the mid-terms

(whatever they decide that is going to look like)

the "final opinion of the court" on Roe v Wade comes out

narrowly re-affirming the ruling

 

this isnt what I WANT to see happen

but I would be a fool if I did not see it comming

Anonymous ID: 988c3b May 3, 2022, 4:29 p.m. No.16204717   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4721

>>16204704

>Was this the first SCOTUS opinion leak?

yes

>Wuld be quite coincidental to occur only after jumanji's confirmation.

shes confirmed

but not yet appointed

 

because they decided to leak Stephen Breyers "retirement"

kek

 

interesting times indeed