Seems to be their favorite war shout:
fight like Hell.
Tell us something we don't know,
Devils.
Does the idiot know that Court declared for RvW in the first place?
Offerings to Moloch was believed to bring prosperity.
Removing RvW now,
when Russia,
Russia,
Russia is what they are reeing about.
Got a suspicion that Trump endorsed some of these types to ensure Republican votes against RvW.
There's a reason.
Roe v Wade?
The Holy Spirit was the Power that caused that egg to form Christ's flesh.
Oh,
and that quote you provided,
was Eve saying that.
Even she meant that it was God's power who allowed her conceive.
And another thing.
the Lord didn't do anything with anyone's help.
Mary didn't "help" anything.
The angel Gabriel didn't ask Mary permission.
He announced to her she would be pregnant.
I don't hold to the false doctrine that Mary was the mother of God.
She is the mother of Christ's flesh.
If you are the anon I think you are,
I don't hold to your other assertions.
If not,
I beg pardon in advance.
The Catholic term "immaculate conception" is used to refer to how Mary herself was conceived.
(And it's false.)
In order for humans to be born of an earthly father,
sperm is definitely required.
Jesus did not have an earthly father.
No sperm required.
God created man and woman.
He also knows how to get an egg to form a complete human without the use of sperm.
As to her age,
she was a virgin,
and women in those days usually married in their mid-teens.
The exact age however is impossible to know.
How can it be "rape" when only Mary's egg was used for the conception?
That was not "consent".
That was an answering prayer submitting to God's will.
Show the verse where Gabriel,
or God,
asked her permission.
There isn't one.
And btw,
note she said "handmaid".
Handmaid's didn't give "consent" before they obeyed their masters.
The definition of "rape" is a man violating a woman.
She didn't give consent.
She submitted to God her Lord.
She felt honored to be the vessel to carry His Son's flesh.
Definitely sperm was not required,
and yes,
she became pregnant regardless.
I believe you underestimate God's power to have caused her egg to conceive alone.
Actually,
one may draw those conclusions by the writings of those "goatherds" themselves.
No.
It is a man violating the child.
No one violated Mary.
Only her own egg alone was used for Christ's flesh.
Yes,
God caused her egg alone to form Christ's flesh.
God knows much more,
infinitely more than any man does.
God caused her egg alone to form Christ's flesh.
God knows much more,
infinitely more than any man does…
The Scriptures give this knowledge.
As to your agnosticism,
and whatever else you were prior to that,
it is as your will allows.
That would be like explaining how God made anything from nothing,
that is,
from a technical viewpoint for which you seek.
Basically,
God did and does anything by merely speaking it.
This He showed when He created all things.
You seem to be confusing parables when Jesus was teaching.
The Scriptures also contain historical narrative.
When it comes to the Faith,
there is a reason Jesus commanded "believe".
That's called "Faith",
and it is God's Gift to the heirs of Righteousness.
As for evidence,
it has its important place in the affairs of the world.
But water is used to refer to various things in Scripture.
God's Voice is His Word.
The verse you cite is not God's Word.
The context is the key.
For instance,
in John Chapter 4,
Jesus talks about His Living Water.
He was referring to His Word,
and His Testimony,
the Gospel.
He was not referring to nations of men in that instance.
As for waters,
in the beginning God separated the waters.
The Water of above is God's Word.
Yes, Jesus spoke in parables.
Indeed Scripture is full of parables,
but it also has historical narrative,
if not,
then Jesus didn't fulfill anything.