>>16216534 (PB)
>41:07
are you typing in the moment you click the "reply" button?
picrel
>try to remember this is not END
>this is not your board
>you need to play by the rules
>the dough has been edited correctly
top
fucking
kek
nice to see all the new anon bakers around here
>none of that was even needed
surely they were just trying to demonstrate for anons what kind of treatment they would receive from management as a "baker"
>but hey life goes on
pretty fucking hard to sink this ship
we roll on
kek
timestamps still "fuzzy"
not as bad though
only 1 post out of 4 is out of chronological sync
hit all 4 posts on the same second and I'll call it cool
0 โฒ or bust
kek
indeed
its dasting anon
worth tracking methinks
but
as with everything
its fake and ghey until proven otherwise
5:5
archived offline
>Beware of false prophets
absolutely anon
without a tripcode its SUPER fake and ghey
>inb4 board management deletes the first new -tripcoded- Q post in over year by "accident"
still think its worth tracking
at this point
it has highlighted a possibly unrelated issue with timestamps and post number chronology not matching up exactly for some reason
Ron (I think, maybe it is Jims voice) replied to my post previous bread implying that it was due to a server that crashed and needed re-setting thismorning
absolutely a plausible explanation
see: >>16216540 (PB)
does anyone have good high res images of these pins?
Secret Service event pins are usually octagon in shape
and have colors/ design that relate to the event
picrel
>Jim is claiming that a server crash early this morning is causing certain post
no
the claim is that the server crash is causing the chronology errors in timestamps vs post count number
see: >>16215450 (PB)
>what the fuck is up with the timestamps around here?
picrel
>easy to game those kind of dup posts
dup posts with timestamps dont make a confirmation of iden
kek
a tripcode thoโฆ.
>ya a saw 760 a while ago, left and came back to 741
that has to do with posts being deleted by board management
if you dont refresh your browser while management is deleting posts within the bread, you post count number doesnt go down
so at the end of the bread
you see 751 +however many posts were deleted
if you hit the refresh buttong
orโฆ.
leave the bread and come back
you will see the proper post count
which is why you see posts like these all the time now:
Baker refresh for proper post count
this is informing the baker that posts have been deleted in the current bread, and the baker needs to refresh the page in order to see the proper post count
in order that the baker can time theFresh Breadlink post properly
this is a courtesy to the baker because its annoying to refresh the page as the baker when you are maintining you list of current notes in the reply box within the page
if you refresh the page you loose all the notes you have been collecting but havent posted yet
this happened so often to me as a baker I kept a seperate notepad page open for my notes even though it was more tedious
loosing an entire bread of notes @post 600 fucking SUUUUUUCKS
----------โ
I am instead referring to TIMESTAMPS not properly corelating chronologically with post count numbers
>Timestamps have been fucky, for a little while, now.
yes
they have
anons mention it nearly on a daily basis if you watch all the breads
it never usually correlates with anything dasting
its just wierd to note
the timestamps not chronologically matching the sequence of post numbers
>Jim would have said something already
he (or Ron, I cant tell whose voice it is)HASalready said something this morning
definitely lurkin
see: >>16216540 (PB) (Jim/Ron audio message)
>Timestamps have been fucky, for a little while, now.
>yes
>they have
example of 8kun timestamp wonkyness from 1 month ago
"proof" that the timestamps have been fucky around here for a while:
>>16006825 (PB)
>โฆTimestamp glitch check'd.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16006245.html#16006825
>Black Thursday > Friday the 13th.
nice ID fag
>5aa556
>Sometimes we get a hit, sometimes we don't.
spin the wheel one more time?
>Server Crash?
thats what the Watkins say: >>16216540 (PB) (Jim/Ron audio message)
>[Server Targeted]
surely possible, sorry for the inconvienence
>Deletions
yuup
>Censorship
all guud
>Free speech does not apply in a private co setting.
thats whay I keep hearing
>The risk?
all earsโฆ
>Loss of revenue.
there really a lot of money to be had in chan boards?
>Backstopped by the circus.
isnt it all?
>Learn.
oen is always trying
students mind
>[BDT]
comped
>[Biker]
comped
>[Dart]
kek
>[Tracker]
I would assume yes
>COMMS understood? 5:5?
5:5
archived offline
as always
think for yourself
>One indicated that every picture and post are passing through mods
kek
they have us surrounded
poor bastards
>at least they're running the board
its da tru tru
>pretty demanding on anons time to bake
also tru
as always
in life
a balance must be found and struck
>The names change. The tactics do not.
agreed
anon knows all these names
probably represents 2-3 actual individuals
>I'll take FJ's absentee landlord style
same
it was SO MUCH better when "management" almost didnt even existโฆ.
>whenever an anon bakes, sure as shit a big argument happens
over the smallest most inconsequential bullshit
>oss banhammer
somehow I managed to miss that
kek
I went digital hermit for a year and came back to "new management"
>Jenna adds 'Ultra-MAGA' to the resume
I thought Jenna EllisEsqwas on the Disney Groomers legal defense team?
we'll call you
>Since OSS and continuing now there's 5 pages worth each day.
OSS impersonation happens
if the behavior of "managment" didnt actualy CHANGE with the switch from "OSS banhammer mode" to "new management"
is it theoretically possible that banhammer OSS was a fabrication using the costume of a well defined/ well known namefag?
>The it's all been Kabuki this whole time theory.
I lean towards this
for reference
I started baking UNDER Gerbil during the 93 days of 8chan deplatforming
on ENDCHAN which had a well populated /qresearch/ "bunker" board
"FreeBaker" also baked there
that is to say
have been watching this cast of charactors for a long time
>"well we get to act shit now because someone else acts shit before"
you are absolutely right anon
this has been stated multiple times by "new management" in the META threads
literally anything is acceptable now beacuse "OSS bad"
which is at least part of the reason I lean towards "banhammer OSS" being 100% Kabuki