Anonymous ID: 071024 May 5, 2022, 10:55 p.m. No.16219782   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9786

>>16219746

>you damage the pursuit of the revelation of truth

>the pursuit of the revelation of truth

>the pursuit of the revelation

A contradictory notion.

Can you pursue revelation?

/picrel/

What sort of cocksucking God would create those who revel in "perfect" hatred?

Hatred is a real and necessary aspect of human being.

But it is always particular… and hence "imperfect".

We rightly HATE those who actively come at us now, seeking with all their power to destroy everything good.

But the hatred itself is an aspect of our finitude.

We cannot grasp every little aspect of their being.

We can't.

We are not God.

God sees into the heart of even Klaus Schwab and sees what is good.

I see merely a ridiculous simulacrum of a man who should be ground into food for maggots.

But God has placed me here, it seems.

Anonymous ID: 071024 May 5, 2022, 11:09 p.m. No.16219814   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9822

>>16219786

>one`s statement stands.

And so does the statement of the other.

We are both right if I lay down some grammar on you.

>>16219746

>you damage the pursuit of the revelation of truth

I should hope so.

Revelation cannot be pursued and so should not be.

But perhaps we can become aware that it is an option (and even guide others towards that awareness).

>>>16219726 (You)

 

>to support you own ego.

 

>there will be an reckoning

You need a comma there.

To support your own ego, there will be a reckoning.

Well I should hope so!

People think of "ego" in some faulty misguided Freudian sense, but if the ego is just the self becoming more and more active, then isn't it just God's own creation learning to become what it was meant to be?

Maybe your true "ego" isn't inerently in conflict with other egos?

Anonymous ID: 071024 May 5, 2022, 11:20 p.m. No.16219843   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9995

>>16219822

>if revelation cannot be pursued

>many tibetan monks

>do not

>in fact

>exist

Many tibetan monks do exist.

But they pursue what might seem to be a revelatory obliteration of self.

But perhaps they misidentify the self simply as a bundle of desires blocking engagement with true reality?

Perhaps they fail to perceive that the true self might be a locus of creativity that was always awaiting actualization via courage…

A self that does not overwhelm the rest of reality but makes it shine even brighter…