dChan
Anonymous ID: 32e21a May 6, 2022, 5:02 a.m. No.16220494   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16220334 (lb)

>>16220337 (lb)

This WaPo article doesn't appear to be hindered by paywall nonsense; probably because age? Could be something, could be nothing. Check that date, yo. Another thing to consider about "PSYWAR". If it wasn't effective, if it didn't work, if it didn't leave to a mutual interest in saving as many lives as possible and bringing an end to conventional warfare, they wouldn't keep working on it:

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2001/12/10/when-bombs-are-not-enough/b422ecf8-19c0-4139-921d-569783dba2b7/

When Bombs Are Not Enough

Anonymous ID: 32e21a May 6, 2022, 5:27 a.m. No.16220585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0648

>>16220548

>The Praxeological Aspect of Polylogism

Long/Short:

"Here's a wordy theory for you to read in order to embrace the idea we all think differently, and there's nothing you can do about it but acknowledge it and treat everyone differently".

 

Long/Short made even shorter:

They want you divided.

Anonymous ID: 32e21a May 6, 2022, 5:55 a.m. No.16220671   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1139

>>16220648

>In truth, there is nothing you can do stop a self-reflecting complex formal system from experiencing and being observed as experiencing a system of professional weaponized deception that RELIES on the false notion that polylogism is the axiom for humanity.

True; that's how indoctrination works; because it's considered a self-fulfilling doctrine. It's a cycle of deception that perpetuates. The problem with the premise is it (intentionally) ignores cognitive potential. Everyone has the ability to reconcile their subjective experience with objectivity so long as they remain open to the possibility that their own perceptions may be errant.

 

>Code in one country is the same logic as code in every other worldwide, and humans who communicate in free cyberspace never met each other and yet all share the exact same, an IDENTICAL logic of mind, of discourse, of information itself.

Right! Because logic doesn't adhere to biases.

Anonymous ID: 32e21a May 6, 2022, 6:35 a.m. No.16220806   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0840 >>0864

>>16220784

Let's say JD had a change of heart and is all in on Pres. Trump, and the mission. Whatever that mission is includes endorsing Oz. Now there are some really great trolls out there generating a lot of buzz over this. You know why? That's their job.

 

Let's say JD didn't have a change of heart and is all in on Pres. Trump because he really ain't got no choice in the matter, and he has to participate in the mission because "or else". Whatever that mission is includes endorsing Oz. Now there are some really great trolls out there generating a lot of buzz over this. You know why? That's their job.

 

I'll add that Jenna came to JD's defense against Gorka. Gorka went on the personal attack against Jenna as a result. The devil always likes to bring up the past.

 

I love Fridays.

Anonymous ID: 32e21a May 6, 2022, 6:48 a.m. No.16220864   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0873

>>16220840

>have to do with Dr. Oz's campaign and endorsement?

 

>>16220806 ←- Explanation

Lots of folks didn't want to get on the JD train, initially. There was a reason he was endorsed. There's a reason for each endorsement, and sometimes those endorsements aren't for the same reasons as other endorsements, but there's always a reason for it. Ya know, like there's a plan in place or something.

 

People pissing themselves over JD "doing a thang" still ain't "gettin' it".