Knowing what Anon knows now…past clearer.

Anon imagine knowing what Q knew then.

And imagine knowing what the [D][R]'s knew then.

Anon guessing that there was reciprocal 'knowing' what 'the other' was saying and what they were doing. E.g. The swamp knew Q knew the swamp was lying, but it's only necessary that the public know or not know whether the deception from us is 'true' or 'false'.

Staring right into evil on that.

Lies like 'Russia hacked the DNC server' can only 'work' if the public receives such outputs and sees it for something OTHER than a dialectic inversion of the truth, to PREVENT those good who do know the truth when the deception objects are sourced for the first time as n 'utterance', with fake news echo repeat and pedowood echo repeat…to trick the population into believing a story that quite literally is intended to look and feel the way it had.

There is a critical flaw in that 'logic of humanity'.

Because it can only 'work' if there exists lots and lots of human bodies deceived into repeating, like mockingbirds, the logos of what we should all be willing to accept and admit to have occurred in history, pure evil.

If the world's population had in their minds not 'the' opposite but 'a' manufactured side of one dialectic information blast that was designed to prevent good people from uniting with the people who trust the deception and thus 'see' the people trying to stop the evil as the evil and the evil as the good.

Anon guessing once DNC emails leaked,

>>16234733

How do you navigate around and stop an evil that the world is structured to 'trust' as good, if the good that tries to stop it is itself followed by information intended to stop that stop, but then there would have to be another stop to the stop to the stop.

Negating the negation was an IMPLEMENTED logic, with a big MOVIE that was ritually enacted with billions of human beings unwitting 'extras'.

Yes humans do become 'actors' if the information outputted is intended as an inversion of the truth to prevent the good from defeating evil.

Evil negates the good negates the evil…

This code is easily crackeable…provided the world knows of its usage.

>>16234762

"Movies and countermoves" is the structure of the evil and so must be of the good if there is going to be in the first instance an open source and consistent interface.

World is watching

>>16234787

Anon believe if the source(s) of the inversion refuse to have open source interface with their products…the misled populations who become commodities…assets.

Communism contrary to negating capitalism is a negation of the professed goal of it.

Communism is when populations are commodities of another group of people who operate within the dialectic inversion that the targeted population 'sees' in the narrative…

Who owns/controls the currencies?

Loudest source of inversion that has the highest level of intimidation and harassment every which way in the 'narrative'.

If the sources of that inversion are unwilling to be honest and open source with their targeted victims, that is an epistemological view of not just thinking but implementing sub-human farm animal 'grooming' in the mental space.

If such a source repeatedly refuses to have open source interface with the world it has deceived, then it can be destroyed provided the world rejects the division code as manufactured and intended to keep us as 'cattle'.

>>16234804

Your demonic code of negating God is a permanent self-negation error loop that must also have with the truth 'alienated' from the source, but in 'strings'