Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 8:07 p.m. No.16238664   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8671 >>8677

>>16238654

All that needs to happen now is someone comes up with B, injects into Watkins, posts on Q's board, and then they'll be Jim tier faggotry and BO level not asking if globals can still post on Q's board. None of you are interested in finding out if it can still happen, because none of you are legitimate Q followers. Publically demand answers, or you're all compromised.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 8:12 p.m. No.16238684   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8706 >>8788

>>16238671

That's all well and good, but you have to wonder how long after the challenge was presented in meta it's going to take to get truth from this crew, right? Because note now they have shut up, haven't theyโ€ฆ

 

>>16238677

I've been challenging in META for weeks on this point. I have a low opinion of staff because no one wants truth and no one was honesty.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 8:18 p.m. No.16238731   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8748

>>16238706

>Ah, so you are an instigator?

I instigate nothing, the dishonesty is the first action. That is ongoing. Calling it out and demanding public answers for things that need answers SHOULDN'T require HAMMERING the point home. We are on a Q board, are we not? The fact that they think they are above -securing Q's board- for any reason whatsoever spells DOOM for anon.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 9:19 p.m. No.16239013   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16238994

Have you ever met a woman who prefers directly taking action upon their own shoulders? Because let me tell you, there is no overcoming the tendency of a million years plus of biology. (Not a joke, presence of historical artifacts prove human presence then, or time travel which essentially means much longer can be assumed, ergoโ€ฆ)

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 9:28 p.m. No.16239051   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16239032

Unions are retarded. It's a problem humans have. Walk through the logic for a moment with me. "There is an imbalance between an employee and employer" Right? Ok, so then employee, employer, union. Right, so now employee is 1/3rd instead of the much larger 1/2 in impact. So why would the claim be imbalance lessening? It's just another system taking a bite out of your life. Reduce subservient systems to experience freedoms. Simple.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 9:35 p.m. No.16239078   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16239054

It's easy, I have to simply start talking about how spineless staff is about no one demanding truth about their boss and you staff scatter, no matter what my identity is. Let's be clear about who is locked in with who. Or did you forget that you're ignoring, just like usually, the material relevance in favor of ad hominem attacking an anon of no consequence?

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 10:16 p.m. No.16239234   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9244

>>16239157

>Compromised Q board

Get a load of this chud. He thinks I didn't watch 2000 mules and thinks he's going to make me scared of LIGHT coming to a LIGHT BRINGER.

You moron, TELLING you that you're in the shit is not the same thing as CAUSING the shit. Fix your targeting. I want every cheater and funder thereof DEAD, including here. GET IT?

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 10:22 p.m. No.16239250   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9260 >>9274

>>16239244

Excuse me, that's my rhetoric, you can't just copy it and think you're thinking. Not a one of you can address my points instead of namecalling ad hominems.Let's see you tell me WHAT is inconsistent and WHY? I'd LOVE to hear an intellectually honest argument for once.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 10:29 p.m. No.16239268   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9299

>>16239260

You like semantics, so use whatever semantic you prefer, but we both know that you're not seeking understanding, instead attempting to smear without touching the point, as per usual. Ever heard of the phrase "shooting the messenger"? I forgot you're averse to phrases and thought.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 10:35 p.m. No.16239288   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9291 >>9321

>>16239274

I object to rhetoric IN STEAD OF addressing my points. That you fail to understand that does not speak very highly of your intelligence given that I have made my point about how compromised detractors are for PREFERRING to engage with me THAN DEMAND HONESTY AND TRUTH from staff. Are you 5:5 yet, or are you going to continue pretending to be a retard? It's no good being able to contort your mind if you end up in a mind pretzel neglecting global positioning.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 10:40 p.m. No.16239302   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9322

>>16239291

I have yet to see any staff ask Jim, have yet to get a straight answer from Jim myself, about whether Q's board is still compromised by allowing the possibility of global moderator interference. The -very thing that likely is why Q has not posted-. Because I haven't seen it after yelling about it and being censored and namecalled and ridiculed, for demanding what Q asked for from the very beginning, I have drawn the conclusion that staff are not being honest, of this board or the admin, who calls me a thug.

Anonymous ID: f41be5 May 8, 2022, 10:51 p.m. No.16239359   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16239339

And yet you have nothing to say about my challenge to one's honesty and credibility, but boy abstracting on a meta level sure can be fun to distract you from my original argument. Call it the Q Board Question. If no one ever answers the Q Board Question, how can we really trust ANYTHING coming out of administration? It's like the JQ so you should be familiar with the general format.