>T until points denied, countered, or addressed at all: Never.
Guys, don't think about this too hard, we implore you, saying the magic words OSSfnord, we implore you to go back to sleep.
>T until points denied, countered, or addressed at all: Never.
Guys, don't think about this too hard, we implore you, saying the magic words OSSfnord, we implore you to go back to sleep.
That's good, no thought put into that reply at all. Good script reader.
You left Q in your name field, moron.
Fucking namefags are the worst. SMH
All that needs to happen now is someone comes up with B, injects into Watkins, posts on Q's board, and then they'll be Jim tier faggotry and BO level not asking if globals can still post on Q's board. None of you are interested in finding out if it can still happen, because none of you are legitimate Q followers. Publically demand answers, or you're all compromised.
That's all well and good, but you have to wonder how long after the challenge was presented in meta it's going to take to get truth from this crew, right? Because note now they have shut up, haven't theyโฆ
I've been challenging in META for weeks on this point. I have a low opinion of staff because no one wants truth and no one was honesty.
>Ah, so you are an instigator?
I instigate nothing, the dishonesty is the first action. That is ongoing. Calling it out and demanding public answers for things that need answers SHOULDN'T require HAMMERING the point home. We are on a Q board, are we not? The fact that they think they are above -securing Q's board- for any reason whatsoever spells DOOM for anon.
Correct
Correct. When indexing into a corpus, overruns are the only real errors.
Where did all the faggots calling me names go? Don't want to talk to me anymore when I call out how spineless and anti-Q in spirit you are? Dark to Light?
WHO ORDERED THE CODE RED!?
All shittalk, no previously accomplishments? PATHETIC!
Censor lust.
Reconcile the contrast?
Have you ever met a woman who prefers directly taking action upon their own shoulders? Because let me tell you, there is no overcoming the tendency of a million years plus of biology. (Not a joke, presence of historical artifacts prove human presence then, or time travel which essentially means much longer can be assumed, ergoโฆ)
Unions are retarded. It's a problem humans have. Walk through the logic for a moment with me. "There is an imbalance between an employee and employer" Right? Ok, so then employee, employer, union. Right, so now employee is 1/3rd instead of the much larger 1/2 in impact. So why would the claim be imbalance lessening? It's just another system taking a bite out of your life. Reduce subservient systems to experience freedoms. Simple.
It's easy, I have to simply start talking about how spineless staff is about no one demanding truth about their boss and you staff scatter, no matter what my identity is. Let's be clear about who is locked in with who. Or did you forget that you're ignoring, just like usually, the material relevance in favor of ad hominem attacking an anon of no consequence?
>Compromised Q board
Get a load of this chud. He thinks I didn't watch 2000 mules and thinks he's going to make me scared of LIGHT coming to a LIGHT BRINGER.
You moron, TELLING you that you're in the shit is not the same thing as CAUSING the shit. Fix your targeting. I want every cheater and funder thereof DEAD, including here. GET IT?
Excuse me, that's my rhetoric, you can't just copy it and think you're thinking. Not a one of you can address my points instead of namecalling ad hominems.Let's see you tell me WHAT is inconsistent and WHY? I'd LOVE to hear an intellectually honest argument for once.
That is a lot of work. Excellent meme.
You like semantics, so use whatever semantic you prefer, but we both know that you're not seeking understanding, instead attempting to smear without touching the point, as per usual. Ever heard of the phrase "shooting the messenger"? I forgot you're averse to phrases and thought.
Hint for you, it's in picture form for your eventual understanding.
I object to rhetoric IN STEAD OF addressing my points. That you fail to understand that does not speak very highly of your intelligence given that I have made my point about how compromised detractors are for PREFERRING to engage with me THAN DEMAND HONESTY AND TRUTH from staff. Are you 5:5 yet, or are you going to continue pretending to be a retard? It's no good being able to contort your mind if you end up in a mind pretzel neglecting global positioning.
Architecture is a hint, much older than revolutionary american times.
I have yet to see any staff ask Jim, have yet to get a straight answer from Jim myself, about whether Q's board is still compromised by allowing the possibility of global moderator interference. The -very thing that likely is why Q has not posted-. Because I haven't seen it after yelling about it and being censored and namecalled and ridiculed, for demanding what Q asked for from the very beginning, I have drawn the conclusion that staff are not being honest, of this board or the admin, who calls me a thug.
If you do not require the capability to differentiate light from dark, then look not upon one bringing light and banishing shadows, for your eyes are not your neighbors'.
Projector projecting about projecting projecting to stop projecting.
B posting on /projectDcomms/
Which Q asked to be read only and not have moderator intervention, and yet B posted on it.
And yet you have nothing to say about my challenge to one's honesty and credibility, but boy abstracting on a meta level sure can be fun to distract you from my original argument. Call it the Q Board Question. If no one ever answers the Q Board Question, how can we really trust ANYTHING coming out of administration? It's like the JQ so you should be familiar with the general format.