Converted
>best: adding it to globals, so Qanon.pub guys see the request for sure
Just contact maintainer of qanon.pub
The contact details are on qanon.pub
They could become actors. They are very good at lying.
>of course shills quickly are triggered.
I suggested contacting the owner of qanon.pub
What is wrong with that?
You want something changed. There are contact details. Just write him a message.
>suggesting I write those guys a mail.
If you actually looked up the contact details, you would see that there is a link to an end-to-end encrypted chat.
https://keybase.io/qntmpkts#_
There is also an e-mail address, which is protonmail. What stops you from creating an email on protonmail and using that?
qntmpkts-at-protonmail.com
If you believe protonmail is not secure (it probably isn't / NSA has access), why would you think writing on here would be? Nothing on the internet is secure or anonymous.
>an anon asking another anon to contant them with other means, making it harder for this anon is just what shills are trying for years now
First of all, let's say you put YOUR PERSONAL REQUEST into globals and qanon maintainer sees it, but has a question, how is he supposed to contact you? He can't.
I actually had a similar problem with anontimes.com. They have several bugs in their scraper. They actually filter certain notables, which they shouldn't be doing. I tried to contact them, but no contact details are available. I wrote them a message in notables, nothing changed, because they didn't see it.
At the same time I am using protonmail, just like BO. What is the problem again? I never suggested you using your personal e-mail. Protonmail is free. Tons of people use it, including Board Owner, and including the qanon.pub maintainer.
If you think everyone suggesting protonmail is a shill, then BO and qanon.pub maintainer would be shills. Makes sense? no.
So what's your argument again against doing that?
>triggered shills
Hey, I'm actually thinking of writing a message to the maintainer FOR YOU.
You know the so called "triggered shill" will do the work that you could and should be doing.
There still won't be a way to contact you, but that's your problem, not mine.
>>>>16239773
SENT
>well, you stating to do it is not exactly prove you are doing so
I actually did, despite you acting like a jack ass and calling me a shill.
>yeah, you are totally here to help.
I actually am.
>Qanon.pub guys need to know.
Then send them a message, just like I did.
>still you (together with other shills with ridiculous posts like "hey, why improve at all, there are other sites"
Where did I do that?
I wrote originally:
>Just contact maintainer of qanon.pub
>The contact details are on qanon.pub
>attacked my post that was just stating facts
Where is that attack?
You called me shill several times, including even now despite me showing proof that I indeed did what I wrote.
>this is just what globals are made for
Globals weren't made for a replacement of a simple e-mail.
>what you did some minutes ago and I do not believe that you actually want to help.
Incredible, just incredible.
And you want a BV to respond to you despite acting like this?
Nice try, but I'm calm. Just calling someone out on lies.
>rather writing a mail
Yes, you want one single person to change something. That's where an e-mail makes sense, especially when questions may show up.
Tell me how would qanon.pub maintainer contact you? Should that be solved by another global? How is he supposed to identify you? You know in the worst case shills could pretend to be you.
To me an email makes sense. That's what emails are for.
>if you can explain to yourself that you did not shill at all, just do that, it´s not the truth and I know.
Just incredible.
And you are surprised that BVs ignore your posts?
If they would reply, you would probably call them shills as well.
>you did not even dare to acknowledge that a baker who is hiding info like that is a glowing shill.
I'm not the bread police.
The reason for my post was to educate you that contact details are available.
But you are not interested in these.