Baker,

would be great if you could make this a global.

request for Qanon.pub guys: pls rework search function

anons noticed that searching for specific Qdrops is not as convenient on Qanon.pub as it has been on Qmap.pub.

when searching for a specific drop, Qmap.pub (almost) always showed more results.

other anon made that same experience:

>>16233490 pb

this anon guesses that Qanon.pub might only show the drops when the sentences start with the keyword you search for, which leads to not all drops being shown.

maybe computer-wise skilled anons can weight in on that and propose a solution.

>>16239693

I asked baker yesterday (bread 20535) to add it.

and baker acted a little strange, not exactly like he wanted to help anons.

first he was not sure if he was allowed to add globals, I explained that this stuff is precisely what global notables are made for, to have people see stuff w/o having to read through all the notables from every bread, later he said he was going to add it, but added it in a way that was complete bs.

best: adding it to globals, so Qanon.pub guys see the request for sure. a request that would help alot of anons looking up Qdrops w/o specifically remembering the exact wording in the post (what word sentences start with)

not much helpful: adding it as normal notable, but with a titel that get´s the attention of Qanon.pub guys.

absolutely not helpful at all: adding it in a way baker did it, making sure it does not even mention Qanon.pub in the notable name and with that making sure Qanon.pub guys have a very hard time finding it, leading to no quick improvement for anons. a baker like this is not here to help and BVs should get rid of him quick.

>>16234584 pb, notable bun 20535

>>16233869 pb, notable name given by baker: global called (don't agree but will add, there are multiple Q agg sites.).

sadly looks like a shill baking again. trying to give the impression of being here to help while making sure the most important stuff is 'missed'. no need for such bakers.

also, there was a BV around at the time of the discussion with baker, bc this BV locked a double baked bread at that very time, but BV did not weigh in, even when asked for it in nice red text.

BV around now?

>>16239693

>>16239712

good title would obviously include the keywords "Qanon.pub", "request" so those guys see it´s something they are asked to do and most obviously it would be good to have it as global, as this is just the stuff global notables are made for.

pb:

>>16233869 Request for Qanon.pub guys: pls rework search function

>>16239715

of course shills quickly are triggered.

an ANON posting on a board of ANONS is suggesting I write those guys a mail.

sure, that is obviously not what I will do.

bc, the common sense way would be to take this request, a request that would make life of autists more easy, and place it in notables in a way Qanon.pub guys see it.

obviously putting it into global notables (that are always visible) on the board which is the HUB of Q research, is the thing that comes to mind - given you are not a shill at least.

>>16239693

so again, I am askingBVto comment on that and "allow" baker to add below into global notables.

that is what guys who want to help would most obviously do, bc there simply is no reason to not do it.

pb:

>>16233869 Request for Qanon.pub guys: pls rework search function

>>16239728

yeah, I could do that, and still it would not show all the results when searching for a specific keyword. as I well explained.

Qmap.pub always had more results, that seems to be bc Qanon.pub only "finds" a result when the keyword you search for happens to be the start of a sentence.

but thanks a lot for you reply

<please, no improvements, shill baker is not actually a shill

>>16239740

this is a board of anons.

it has notables, that is so this board, as a hub, is usefull to many people.

this board has global notables, for important stuff that can be found w/o having to read through all notables.

if anons realize that Qanon.pup guys have set up their search function in a not much convenient and not accurate way, leading t many drops being missed when searchign for it, it´s just a natural thing to do to make it a global notable in this board.

and stuff like that was obvioiusly done in the past many times.

an anon asking another anon to contant them with other means, making it harder for this anon is just what shills are trying for years now. you will fail, every time, bc what you do ist just to obviously shilling.

>>16239746

so that would be the reason for it being ok for baker to actu shilly and hide info?

>>16239747

in case you were that anon "informing me", let me say again, that this does not show all the results, making it obvious a quick rework of the search function would be best for anons.

>>16239748

sure, anon, that is just the reply a guy who is here to help would give. wondering about the other posts someone saying that made. smells awefully shilly,

nah. will not even stay to read all the bs replies, will just repost it a couple of times to make sure it gets attention. triggered shills again confirmed direction.

and again, putting it in as global is just a no brainer, and everyone sees that.

>>16239769

sure, it is my personal request and I am doing that just for selfish reasons.

and of course you really cannot see how reworking the Qanon.pub search function in a way that it would lead to no drops being missed when e.g. searching for keyword "clown" would make any sense and sure you think it´s a real bad idea to use the global notables section for this, even when this is precisely what globas are made for.

yeah, you are totally here to help.

>>16239787

why would you even argue like this if you are not a shill?

what is it you don´t like about this board, as the hub, being used to let Qanon.pub guys know that anons have a hard time finding all drops in the search and why do you rather want to have it not improved?

you are not an anon.

>>16239773

well, you stating to do it is not exactly prove you are doing so. also it is obviously nothing exactly open and public and would not make Qanon.pub guys kind of accountable.

Qanon.pub not working great.

might get improved easily.

Qanon.pub guys need to know.

anons have a board that is the hub and that is being watched by the whole world

this board has a section for global notables.

putting that request into the globals is the common sense thing to do and it globals have been used like this over and over in the past.

shills being triggered and trying to come up with bs reasons why baker, who intentionally was hiding the info, is not a shill at all and for why Qanon.pub should rather not be improved are just glowing.

last post. will just repost later.

>>16239826

while this might give the impression that you want to help and actually did, still you (together with other shills with ridiculous posts like "hey, why improve at all, there are other sites" or "why not just remember Qdrops and not search for it at all") attacked my post that was just stating facts, like that fact that this is just what globals are made for and like tha fact that baker intentionally was hiding the info by putting it into notables with a bs title that did not even say "Qanon.pub".

so, whatever you do now, I just know what you did some minutes ago and I do not believe that you actually want to help.

and will still repost it, bc BV and anons should be aware of that specific baker.

>>16239836

also, obviously having it in globals still is needed, bc this makes Qanon.pub guys accountable and anons can ask for removing the global once improvement is made.

if guys claim to help, they got to actually do so, or they are doing less then nothing.

lip service is indeed less then nothing.

>>16239847

you suggested that an anon who posts on a board of anons that has a specific sections for "let others know stuff" is rather writing a mail.

just coincidentially other "anons" replied with more ridiculous "reasons" for why it would be totally bad to have it a notable.

globals were made fur exactly that. notables were made for spreading info, bc anons just don´t like writing mails to each other, for reasons you sure understand.

and yes, I guess a BV could easily weigh in on that and e.g. let anons know that he will remove baker from this specific bread that intentionally hid the info.

and obviously BV could easily say "yup, that is ecaxtly what globals are made for, please put it in bc it´s a valid request that would improve stuff for anons."

someone volunteering on a Q research board who is spreading truth and fighting the deep state would be likely to do that.

and I am pretty sure a BV or BO will do just that when I repost it later today, as graveyard shift is not the shift with most guys around.

if you can explain to yourself that you did not shill at all, just do that, it´s not the truth and I know.

also, despite me mentioning that couple of times, you did not even dare to acknowledge that a baker who is hiding info like that is a glowing shill.

have a good day. and think about breaking free, bc your way will lead you nowhere.