>>16240508
it only mean that you can't trust 'on - line'
and that's why the pointer was given to save off line and have your own copies of everything, if possible.
shill bakers are real.. .
and I noticed recently they came back
Notables is usually bs IMO, but still useful
best is to scan yourself
that's where you will find the real good stuff.
anon hardly ever gets notabled.
I don't believe it's because what I put forward is unworthy.
also, some people are slow, you have to account for that.. baking is very hard and takes fast work, which means bakers can no always reflect on what they are doing.
the public ('masses') is ever slowing.
so I've figured that the subpar work of bakers could actually be a feature, not a bug
anon suggests you try to get your own text copy of the q communiques.
they used to exist.
Have no idea what the comment means 'original anons arent here' 'and this proves it'
kekekkkekk
that's a tell, fer sure.
If anon wants to excuse them, will just say 'they must be tired' 'It's been a long haul' and a lot of work has been done by very few.
very few have carried the burden of many.
of course system makes it very easy for bakers who are in bad faith to take control.
Just the way it is, Have to factor that in.
NEW BO has done great
so happy with that.
what is the search that didn't come up.
anon has a search
(often brings up items that weren't searched for;;-by tangent, opposite problem of what you have.)