>>1624108
Not at all
More akin to a Prosecutor
pertinent, until one can translate at least Hebrew
http:/ /www.bibletopics.com/BibleStudy/164.htm
Good point out
The Book of Revelation is a fascinating read, but the mentions of Satan doesn't imply it as name, whatever the great dragon is, was called Satan, like a title
Like Christ is a title
I would defer to your knowledge of the Bible if you are versed in it, but the way I understand, that title is rather neutral, just like how we have prosecuting lawyers who can be good or bad,
or how we can be the accuser of others
for good reasons or bad ones
I'm down to really get into the meat of this, but if you and any other anons are interested, let's move this topic to it's appropriate board, so we don't muddy up the QResearch here.
I must emphasize that Dialogue between the followers of religions are crucial to the aims of Q and our movement.
For the record for curious anons, consider my faith as close ro a Mason in the original sense, as opposed to any particular religious denomination, nor do I follow any single one. I respect them all (except the ones that make allowances for harm against others for personal gain, especially children)
I apologize for my part in the trolling, anon
Just the concernfagging here is way frequent and it became hilarious to me
But I jumped the gun on what you wrote, that's my fault. It's a warzone out there these days. I am grateful for your clear response to the trolling to help me snap back
From what I understand, and please correct me if I'm innacurate, Dianetics was a precursor to Scientology that was very effective in remediating psychological issues in people. I'm not sure about the concepts of us being suppressed by virtue of being overwhelmed by dead spirits or Xenu (if that's really an aspect of their system), but Scientology's distinct Anti-Psychiatry drugging stance did and still does have my respect.
Reflecting on it, Scientology has had a lot of MSM bashing over the years, including those News mini documentaries that (in retrospect) were probably edited to make Scientologists look crazy. The same for the bashing South Park gave it However, there are some things I've heard over the years, like the child labor camps they supposedly had, or the common assumption that because Hubbard was a Sci-Fi writer, he conjured up some sci-fi into a religion to make money. And the whole Tom Cruise looking crazy on TV thing (albeit that could have been edited and spun as such?)
Honestly I don't know what is true in these respects, I would defer to your judgement.
Some Satanists are Atheistic, what is your take on why that is?
Also I've heard through Alan Horvath on YT that the name of that Fallen angel was Gadriel, any insights you can share?
No problem anon, I respect that and I appreciate your level-headed response
Breath of fresh air, considering the topic :)
Thank you anon, I really appreciate your dialogue :)
I will read those verses, I cannot claim to be an expert on Jesus' ways
Some are def Theistic and believe in an actual Satan being.
From what I've seen the Atheistic ones are largely of the Anton Lavey style of what is essentially Hedonistic and Egoism glorification. Temple of Set was supposedly the evolution of this one, which I think may be closer to the type you point out. I believe Michael Aquino was a leader in this particular church.
There are spiritually Agnostic Satanists who believe in the power of individuality, personal evolution and personal Willpower, and the right to enjoy life without doing harm. I find the latter rather compatible with Christianity.
I look at Christianity's sects the same way, not all are equal. The Catholic version is clearly wrought with corruptions. The Coptic version is fascinating and attuned with God's Natural Law, which I appreciate. The Jesus version is great too, regardless if the story was lifted from older belief systems or not, is filled with excellent examples for human behavior not only for maintaining a well functioning civilization, but also for fighting for what is right AND for personal self-empowerment. The Kingdom of Heaven residing within each of us is a key aspect of the Truth, imo
Would love to hear your thoughts, or hit up another board to discuss if you're down
My take is he's a limited hangout
His recent seeming associations of Q as "Alice" bothers me
Sad, because a lot of the earlier drops he made were awesome
Limited hangouts are notorious for seeding confirmable evidence to gain trust, then upon that platform of trust, filling heads with lies, or obfuscating further truth
We'll see though, might be code or subtle comms
Regardless, trust Q
This is very much a possibility
Look at how the Bundy Family got smeared to all hell because of their armed occupation of that State land?
It's a hard call though
Does, but some people absolutely do get trapped in paranoid states.
I think it depends on the individual mindset and mood going in that determines that outcome