>>16240869 (pb)
I already told you, qanon.pub DOES NOT INCLUDE THE REPLY TREE on default.
If you wanted to search my posts, does it make sense to also include the content of every post that I replied to?
Even if so, should that at least be optional?
>and what kind of question is that?
>is that supposed to try me if I am a newfag shill or is that supposed to look like you would know stuff?
It actually checks if you understand Q drops, or not. It seems like you don't.
You probably consider everything shown to be part of the Q drop, but that isn't the case. Not everything seen was written by Q. Sometimes Q replied to anons. Sometimes Q replied to Q.
When Q replied to a post, is that OTHER post part of that Q drop and should be searched as well?
That's what this is actually about.
Did Q say HRC would get arrested in 2017?
No, that never happened. The 2017 is mentioned in a post that Q REPLIED to.
qanon.pub does not include reply content.
operationq.pub does
Maybe you think it should search through reply content per default. That's your opinion. But why would you think a site should change that based on your opinion? Wouldn't that even confuse other people who expect it to search the way it currently does?