present
lurqing
>>The previous Baker had some of his Notables quietly removed / modified.
Wow anon.
Sounds really juicy.
Let's have those LINKS.
Which posts were deleted?
Which posts were modified?
>Haha good luck getting an answer
Surely no anon would make a claim like that wo/evidence to support it.
kek.
>Board log shows massive deletions over the past few days
Yeah - too bad board is under attack.
Wonder who could be responsible….
>a lot of shills don't even know they are shills
>They study the lies really hard and convince themselves the lies are truth
First they lose their minds and later, their souls.
Don't need to be smart to be persuasive. Just repeat, repeat, repeat.
Noticed that too.
Shills seem meaner and strike more below the belt than in the past.
Then they are crazies coming unglued bc times are tough. They all land on boards like this. Lucky us.
Idiot's Effort to DEBUNK 2000 Mules
Based on the following specious arguments:
-
cell phone tracking data isn't that precise
>(probably false - gps can track my phone to within 30 ft from where i am)
-
there might be reasons "someone might issue multiple ballots"
>(incoherent, but i guess it means reasons why someone might deposit more than one ballot - you know, like 20 or 30)
-
film didn't prove individuals collected ballots >(bet there's another film that could be made showing exactly where the ballots were collected from)
-
film can't prove their political affilitions
(>not yet - but more research will determine this)
-
perps wore gloves to avoid fingerprints
>("pure speculation" - check warm v cold weather locales - easy to so)
-
wo/this ballot collection sys, Trump would have lost
>(they didn't look at all the OTHER ballot problems - which are numerous)
corrected
Idiot's Effort to DEBUNK 2000 Mules
Based on the following specious arguments:
-
cell phone tracking data isn't that precise
>(probably false - gps can track my phone to within 30 ft from where i am)
-
there might be reasons "someone might issue multiple ballots"
>(incoherent, but i guess it means reasons why someone might deposit more than one ballot - you know, like 20 or 30)
-
film didn't prove individuals collected ballots
>(bet there's another film that could be made showing exactly where the ballots were collected from)
-
film can't prove their political affilitions
(>not yet - but more research will determine this)
-
perps wore gloves to avoid fingerprints
>("pure speculation" - check warm v cold weather locales - easy to so)
-
wo/this ballot collection sys, Trump would have lost
>(they didn't look at all the OTHER ballot problems - which are numerous)
>Notables ARE Endorsements
Disagree.
Notables are items that most anons believe would likely be of interest to anons on QR or others who either follow Q or want alt-news or other info that can't be easily found elsewhere.
Letting the baker make the final decision ensures there is at least one anon checkinf for sauce so most of the info is reasonably accurate. System isn't perfect but that is the goal.
sometimes things do suck
suffering's a part of life
what are u learning from this experience?