Anonymous ID: 6bf7f0 May 9, 2022, 4:46 p.m. No.16244087   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://t.me/RichLDNRDGorillaBroadcast

 

GET ALL THE AMMO YOU NEED FOR THE DIGITAL BATTLE FIELD HERE https://t.me/RichLDNRDGorillaBroadcast & KEEP BLASTING THE USEFUL IDIOTS OF THE DEEPSTATE!

 

THEY ARE ON THE ROPES! DO NOT LET UP!!!

Anonymous ID: 6bf7f0 May 9, 2022, 5:20 p.m. No.16244311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4336 >>4370 >>4378 >>4529 >>4713 >>4763

https://windobi.com/fact-checking-of-2000-mules-the-movie-about-vote-fraud-the-denver-post/ 🦍📡🇺🇸✴️✴️✴️✴️👁👁🤬 SO THESE ARE THE ARGUEMENTS AGAINST THE FACTS SHARED DURING THE 2000 MULES DOCUMENTARY CLAIM: At least 2,000 “mules” were paid to illegally collect and deliver ballots to deliver boxes in key swing states ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

 

THE FACTS: It is true that the vote has not proved this. The finding is based on false assumptions about the precision of cell phone tracking data and the reasons someone might issue multiple ballots, experts said. CLAIM: In Philadelphia alone, True the Vote identified 1,155 “mules” illegally collecting and delivering ballots for money.

 

THE FACTS: No, it didn’t. The group has provided no evidence of any sort of paid vote-gathering program in Philadelphia. And True the Vote didn’t get surveillance footage of drop boxes in Philadelphia, so the group based this claim solely on cell phone location data, researcher Gregg Phillips said in testimony to Pennsylvania state senators in March. CLAIM: Some of the True the Vote “mules” identified in Georgia were also geolocated in violent antifa riots in Atlanta in the summer of 2020, showing that they were violent far-left actors.

 

THE FACTS: Apart from the fact that the film does not prove that these individuals did not collect ballots at all, it also cannot prove their political affiliations.

 

The anonymized data that True the Vote kept does not explain why anyone could be present at a protest demanding justice for black police deaths. The individuals followed there could be violent rioters, but they could also be peaceful protesters, police or firefighters responding to the protests, or business owners in the area. CLAIM: Alleged vote collectors were caught on surveillance video wearing gloves because they didn’t want to leave their fingerprints on the ballots.

 

THE FACTS: This is pure speculation. It ignores much more likely reasons for wearing gloves in the fall and winter of 2020 – cold weather or COVID-19.

 

It is true that the Vote’s investigator in the film claimed that voters in Georgia started wearing gloves to prevent their fingerprints from touching the ballot envelopes, after two women in Yuma, Arizona, were indicted on December 23, 2020 for alleged vote-gathering at the primaries in that state. But the lawsuit in Arizona didn’t mention fingerprints. CLAIM: Without this ballot collection system, former President Donald Trump would have had enough votes to win the 2020 election.

 

THE FACTS: This alleged scheme has not been proven, nor can these investigators know whether the ballots collected contained votes for Trump or for Biden.

 

There is no evidence that a mass vote-gathering system dumped a large number of votes for one candidate into drop boxes, and if it did, it would probably be caught soon, according to Derek Muller, a law professor at the University. from Iowa.