"A lot of the divide comes from the notion that people are divided, and leaders will exploit divisions and religious differences to try and keep people divided to cause conflict to maintain power for themselves in an ideological way" - JK
🧐
Anon would not introduce impossible standard of completeness and consistency (perfection) for any physical object that would itself necessarily be incomplete if it's to even be identified as an existent real, let alone Anon's complex self-reflective formal system called 'self'.
Anon does not see nor need to see nor could claim to see or know without introducing inconsistency, that 'completeness' (attempt to compel an inconsistency in some way to become a consistency from yet another point of view to then escape the deterministic fixed axiom just uttered by the self which an active minded self will necessarily output both inconsistencies if the theorem of completeness was claimed to be idealized and achievable and achieved.
Completeness, contrary to the author's presentation, is not AND CANNOT EVER be an ideal or goal or view of 'true true' reality, of what 'truly' is as opposed to what might accidentally be.
Any complex formal system like every living entity that has ever existed and for any and all practical considerations could only even be closely approximated by estimating how long it would take for humans to develop and take over the entire universe 'ideologically' where all other consciousnesses are pre-populated with the whimsical thoughts of whatever those beings would look like. They wouldn't 'be' God but to the NPC minds everywhere else, they would experience reality as if the physical phenomena is 'natural' and not guided by any intelligence emanating from physical bodies of other lifeforms. But still the 'ruler' would not be God, for even at the infinity, even with every bit of information of the entire universe being controlled by one entity that exists WITHIN THE UNIVERSE AS THE ENTIRE COMPLEX FORMAL SYSTEM OF REALITY ITSELF, that entity would be unable to prove all truths, there would still be knowable truths that the entity with every bit in the universe controlled, could not do it without contradicting itself, without outputting two statements that directly negate the other as true and false.
If the aspiration of philosophy is NOT forever condemned to having to find meaning and value of a species 'in exile' because we have any 'innate deficiency'.
All that talk about people is talk that God is itself inherently divided into the same dialectic logic that has God all of a sudden causing an absence. Anon see big bug with an architecture that outputs the claim that a deficiency can be proved by borrowing from what isn't deficient on one side and also output that that side is a cause of a deficiency on the other side, or vice versa.
Anon see catastrophic bug in assuming that any living entity on Earth introducing two opposites as a means to 'move the world' to where there can be 'completed' tyrannies.
The error as how the subject perceives the source. If any intelligent entity know and see itself as incomplete (if any entity is to consistently output that it is not inconsistent), then all these 'deficiencies' and 'disjunctions' get clarified as to what those thoughts really are about, how to make meaning of them, and then eventually Anon sees that the reason Anon has any awareness of what increasing amounts of completeness is looking to be, Anon's own mind will still be a source of a unified epistemology.
Anon is not 'missing' anything just because Anon can explore imagination of how an incomplete being stands among everyone and everything else.
is not a system to be used by any other living entity let alone the one outputting those contradictions.
This is to say
Critical Race Theory disinformers accuse opponents of Critical Race Theory of being disinformers.
Head of DHS Disinformation Governance Board called opponents of critical race theory 'disinformers'.
Anon is staring evil right in its eye.
The dialectic of 'information and disinformation' according to the radical left allegedly describes everything they say is true on the one hand, and everything that is inconsistent with it is 'dis' information.
That dialectic of 'everything consistent with our introduction of division and inconsistencies is information, everything inconsistent with with our introduction of division and inconsistencies is disinformation.
This is the dialectic inversion (projection) that is being weaponized every day BY THE SOURCE OF THAT DIALECTIC OF DIVISION IN THE FIRST PLACE.
To teach polylogism to children is literally teaching them to regard their own inner selves as split and divided, the person they are as an individual, but they are brainwashed into believing there is another self in them, one that is supposed to speak and think according to their own race.
Racists like this board chief are PROJECTING their own racism and inconsistencies on the rest of the world.
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/head-dhs-disinformation-board-called-opponents-critical-race-theory
These sick fucks are PREYING ON THE IGNORANCE OF THEIR OWN VOTERS
Statements are not proved right in the present just because such statements when made logically precede all other contingent statements such as those consisting of 'disproofs'.
It would be like emailing a person at 11pm at night and then immediately publishing a hit piece that includes a further smear 'our wrap up smear target did not comment on this story'.
No statement is proved true by an absence of a dialectic contradictory statement to it.
>so thats a no 'i cant prove you wrong' in bloated dialect noted
Kek, I am describing your own self imposed dialectic ruleset to you.
Your latest statement is just a looping error of the same dialectic code I just described to you.
Your narrative is itself a reflection of a split 'personality' syntax structure where you're imagining anyone else to be 'doing anything' that allegedly justifies and proves your own statements true.
A statement from source A is not proved true from any objective 'not just A's own beliefs' standard by back referencing another statement from A.
You're just looping on yourself, and that is why Anons can predict your next smear.
Anons cracking the code and all they can do is reeeeeeeeeeee
Second meme dialectic inversion to smear good people who do not disagree with such things being good, because they tend to unite the people while the 'antithesis' that meme divides and weakens people, which makes the meme posting either a mistake or intentional gaslighting, not even Anon's rules there,
==Pharma corruption dismantling in plain sight. FDA 'in code' just admitted that the covid numbers were boosted by 'borrowing' from the flu cases.
Biggest criminal psyop ever is being uncovered before our very eyes.
BOOM
Future is proving past
https://m.theepochtimes.com/fda-americans-should-treat-covid-19-like-the-flu_4453370.html