Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 11, 2022, 10:18 p.m. No.16259074   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9081 >>9133 >>9564 >>0038 >>0254 >>6070 >>9257

Admin, I am sure I am not the only anon to voice this opinion (sure, chekk my hash), but the time has surely come for anon's voices to be heard.

Deleting posts (excluding illegal content) is antithetical to anons.

Since when do we support censorship?

Don't give me any crap about spam, we have had that shit from the onset, but the spam we get is very revealing and tells us much about our enemies, yet you want to delete it?

Suspicious, stupid or short sighted?

 

The deletions casts you, the admin in a negative light.

After recently taking over the board, anons understand you will be attacked; you think deleting those cast you in a good light in the eyes of anons?

Like fuck!

Transparency is the only way.

Keep up your deleting proclivity and anons will view you with disdain, mistrust and every other fucking negative adjective on the planet.

What a fucking surprise.

Funny how this always happens when baker or the board are put under question

And on this post as well.

Que surpresa.

Clear cache and try again, eh?

Yeah, board foibles, sure.

Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 12, 2022, 12:06 p.m. No.16262071   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16261977

>Flash

Well, if that larp wasn't a larp, the board would not be functioning right now.

Were I baker, I wouldn't have put a single flashlarp in notables, but neither would I have deleted them if I were a BV.

Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 13, 2022, 2:46 p.m. No.16269257   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1352

>>16259074

Does admin refuse to respond to this?

Let me just say that that is not a good look and further raises suspicion.

Notice the use of the word transparency in the op?

You have anon's IP hash history, what do anons have?

So far, a deafening, dark silence from board management.

Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 13, 2022, 2:57 p.m. No.16269326   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9389

>>16269273

Are you admin?

You advocate deleting legal posts on QR?

You are pro censorship?

Re-read (or read for the first time), my OP.

Do I really sound like a shill, or an anon who values and advocates free speech?

If we can't find it here, where can we find it?

Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 13, 2022, 6:21 p.m. No.16270485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0589 >>1352

>>16270390

Funny how any criticism of current admin results in the retort "if you don't like it … make your own."

 

Anon landed "here" in feb 2018 and has found nowhere else to park his arse since then.

End chain?

Seriously, nigga?

Half chan?

Seriously, nigga?

Why shouldn't anon pine for what the board originally stood for?

Anon should be vilified for wanting this and daring to raise his voice in disgust at the current state of the board?

Although anon detested the hegemony of fapjack and his muh joo minion, OSS, one cannot help but wonder if, despite her obsessive spam, maybe she had a point.

Admin seem peculiarly reluctant to respond to my OP.

I reiterate, deletion is anathema to free speech.

Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 13, 2022, 6:59 p.m. No.16270712   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16270681

This current admin has a severe case of lack of transparency.

Why should anons be concerned by this?

Do you have something to fear?

If not, respond in the true light of transparency.

Anonymous ID: f1cbd3 May 13, 2022, 7:34 p.m. No.16270875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0911

>>16270861

Anon never once heeded the call to "migrate" to a different board.

Previous board migrations were at the behest of verified Q and anon doesn't see why future migrations should be any different.