Anonymous ID: 05259e May 10, 2022, 10:39 a.m. No.16248615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8620 >>8641

>>16248590

>Now run the #s comparing to this time last year and then the year before that.

You clearly don't remember the early days.

I didn't say we were at peak but we've been way more "dead" than now.

It's not the first time you lack-of-morale shills have attempted to kill this movement. It won't work this time either.

Anonymous ID: 05259e May 10, 2022, 10:43 a.m. No.16248626   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8645

>>16248620

>commenting about the lack of water in the resevoir is the REASON for lack of water in the resevoir

No. There's no lack of water - you are falsely framing the issue.

You are attempting to convince anons the reservoir is out of water, when in fact it is plentiful.

Anonymous ID: 05259e May 10, 2022, 10:57 a.m. No.16248673   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8688

>>16248645

>-there is CLEARLY a lack of bakers

Yeah, the namefag bakers got the boot. The baker drama show did a good job with that.

But not really. There's always a bake going, so It's not really an issue.

>-Dayshit breads used to be ~1hr average, with Q posts it could be less than 30 mins per bread

Some days are fast, some days are slow. Obviously when MSM was targetting us the most and Q was still posting more newfags and shitposters/shills were attracted. Core is the same.

As you point out, bread speed is not a good indicator so what's your point?

 

>the point being made is that the EXTENT of the drop in this particular metric of engagement is notable

No, the point being made was that the movement was dying.

Anonymous ID: 05259e May 10, 2022, 11:09 a.m. No.16248706   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8716 >>8736

>>16248688

>The movement isn't, but QR sure is.

The 2 are intertwined.

>My theory is that's going to be where [truth social] all things Q respike again.

>Particularly if Trump interacts in some form with the@Q account.

Kek… you think a closed network with signup will replace Anons preferred place to talk Q? Holy shit, you're more newfag/shill than I thought.

Why doesn't it surprise me that you are pushing the TS@Q account?

>No outside comms

You lost before you started.

Anonymous ID: 05259e May 10, 2022, 11:19 a.m. No.16248750   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8768

>>16248736

>And without "old Q" dropping like before the wind is blowing towards Truth Social.

It's really not. Anons will go to 4chan or another anonymous board before a closed network.

>And many will have Truth Social accounts when desktop goes live.

Doesn't matter. Anons are anon. TS is not anon.

Anonymous ID: 05259e May 10, 2022, 11:24 a.m. No.16248779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16248768

>lurking /pol/ is still worthwhile

As is lurking TS.

But we can't get around that this is the hub. Like /CBTS/ was before.

As other anon pointed out,That's a good thing.