>>16247871 (PB)
>I'll have a cough of cuppy
covfefe hot off the pot anon
brewed fresh bi-weekly
if it ever tasted a bit off
just tell yourself
two moar weeks
>Wild, huh?
agreed
Jan 2020 was a gut punch to many anons
no Q since has not helped
'new managements' policies have driven off nearly all the anon bakers
why the fuck post something interdasting when it can so easily be deleted as "spam"
why come here to see the "uncensored" internet when this place is so fucking censored now?
many anons come to these places with a sense of FOMO
you miss out on all manner of "discussion" on the censored internet
these chan boards were a bastion of "free" discussion
new management doesnt understand the conditions where autists thrive
and has thus driven away the mist that is weaponized autism
much like the mist
when its conditions return
so shall it
/pol/ still has a moderate PPM if your into that kinda thing
kek!
>pics related
these tits are known as not_Bubbles
not to be confused with Bubbles
who also has a great rack
>This digital storm shit is an 8kun cancer
yea
but its not nearly as bad as that /flash faggot
or OSS posts
Digital Storm posters are "good" spam
you dont know the difference?
>"bad" spam gets the ban hammer/ deleted
>"good" spam is totally cool, please keep posting
>spam is spam
>provide an absolute definition of "spam"
>If you don't know the difference then any explanation won't penetrate that thick skull of yours.
ohh, so you are interested in holding on to the blanket excuse for ANY deletions of ANYTHING
anon: hey, why did you delete my digs?
management: it was spam
anon: hey, why did you delete those spoopy posts?
management: it was spam
anon: hey, why did you delete those questions about board issues?
management: it was spam
anon: hey, why doesn't a SINGLE eBot post get deleted as spam?
management: that is "good" spam
anon: hey, what is spam?
management: spam is spam
anon: can you define spam?
management: fuck you
sounds about right
>u just hate the flash
check the posts from my ID if you want to actually follow the conversation anon
you can shitpost too though
shit is essential
to be clear
I am making a rhetorical point
that there are posts in every bread that any random focus group of anons would likely define as "spam"
and they NEVER get deleted
but spoopy posts like the famefag /flash/
anything related to OSS
and MANY posts raising legitimate concerns about board issues
are all deleted with the excuse given that they were "spam"
it is my claim that this is bullshit
deletions shouldonlybe used forillegalcontent
deleting "spam" is just an excuse for management to get rid of content they dont want here (for whatever reason)
its bullshit
and it should be called out by anons every time it happens
looking at you DART
>THESE POSTS FALL UNDER SPOOPY AND SHOULD NEVER BE DELETED
I agree anon
but I am making a BROADER point in logic
that as a first principle
"spam" can not be absolutely defined
in practice, it will ALWAYS involve an arbitrary judgement call on the part of the person who is "making the call" on weather its "spam" or not
hence
if you ALLOW for "spam" to be a classification that warrants DELETION:
you willalwayshave content being removed "under the cover of" the definition of spam
sometimes it WILL be spam content
other times it will be spoopy posts
other times it will be the dig you are currently posting
other times it could be a Q drop
kek
the point being
posts defined as "spam" should NOT be deleted based on that assesment alone
period
that is my statement in principle
Grassley only drops MOABs
Paris has been inside the traficking network
anon likes this pairing
>what age her parents put her on puberty blockers and hormone therapy.
is "she" is a crossover
that level of morphology required PB's/ hormones administered while in utero
>Why goats milk vs cow's milk?
a few reasons;
goat milk is more tolerable by the early developing gut of an infant vs cows milk
also
goats themsevles are not nearly as "over-farmed" as the cow population from which our cown milk comes from
much less antibiotic use in goats, etc.
its cleaner milk
>explain why Jim allows a group to run a campaign ad
are you familiar with the concept of "money" anon?
do you think server racks grow on trees?
>explain why Jim allows a group to run a campaign ad at the bottom
have you NOT seen the "Qanon membership subscription" adds that they ALSO allow on their ad-space?
>Satanic Temple Will Argue Abortion Is Religious Ritual in Legal Challenges
so much winning
and yet for some reason its still going to be breaking news
>Thank baker with sexual photo?
no
actually
the "canonical" thank you baker bewbs are NOT sexual in nature
they are FERTILE in nature
and
they stem from MIL culture
locker room/ garage posters in MIL families?
pin up girls?
chose /pol/ for a reason kek
bewbs dont = sex
bewbs dont = pr0n
bewbs = healthy babies
prove me fuckin wrong
>Can't wait for the sex tape
can anon think of a better way to get NORMIE eyes on Grassley?
does Grassley drop anything other than MOABs?
does Grassley sometimes speak with coded language/ messages?
do you like corn, anon?
>you lack-of-morale shills have attempted to kill this movement
yeah
thats it
commenting about the lack of water in the resevoir is the REASON for lack of water in the resevoir
solid logic
>No. There's no lack of water
objectively
-there is CLEARLY a lack of bakers
-Dayshit breads used to be ~1hr average, with Q posts it could be less than 30 mins per bread
I am not making the claim that slow breads are a bad thing
they do represent a metric for level of engagement
and that metric is down
objectively
yes, at the very beginning, before influx, there was low posting rate and participation
growth also happens in fits and starts
there are absolutely "luls" with low posting activity for various reasons
the point being made
is that the EXTENT of the drop in this particular metric of engagement is notable
as an objective statement
>Project Looking Glass says
you have one in your closet anon?
and a concious clean enough to use it?
>does anyone have links to flash poster showing up?
DART deleted the posts anon
it was "spam"
>UH OH….this is a real dilemma huh?
>How about you use DISCERNMENT to figure it out?
I kek
but this anon is 100% right
just because something gets nommed
doesnt MAKE it notable
but I have a LOT more tolerance for baker "shooting from the hip"
I MUCH prefer the interaction between anon and baker
which eventually leads to some kind of logic based consesus
this back and forth is helpful for Truth
imo
we get to the RIGHT notables by wading through all the wrong ones
kek
>If someone posts a muh joo shill post and another "anon" called it notable, would you add it to notables?
if I though the alleged "muh joo's" post was actually notable
yes I would
If I discerned that it was bullshit, probably not
and this where you will find me disagree heavily with other anon
Truth Social is fake and ghey
if Q is going to confirm migration to another site
Q will burn this one first
VERY clearly
like pic-related with 4chan
>Q will burn this one first
and
interestingly
Q has NOT burned 8kun yet
despite the ghosting
>Think logically.
logically
one anons "muhJoo's!" shill
is another anons notable
if we are going to play the hypothetical game
want to get specific?
be specific
post the muhjoo shill post that is the example
ohhhhhhhh fuuuuuu
paradox alert
>Because there are way most Q followers outside of QR than inside at this point in time.
on this I agree
and that is a GOOD fucking thing
>nons will go to 4chan or another anonymous board before a closed network.
they already have
lurking /pol/ is still worthwhile
>Q said long ago that it's the minutes, not the seconds
dasting anon
do you have the relevent drop handy?
legit interested
testicles
one more for good luck