10 May, 2022 08:26

British TV censored Zelensky Nazi pic – Russian diplomat

Sky News slot ended after Dmitry Polyansky showed an image of a Nazi symbol posted by Ukraine’s leader

Dmitry Polyansky, the deputy head of Russia’s mission to the UN, has claimed that theUK’s Sky News abruptly ended an interview with him as soon as he showed a photo with a Nazi symbolthat had been posted by the Ukrainian president.

Volodomyr Zelensky had promoted the image on Monday, which marked the victory of the Soviet Union over Adolf Hitler's Germany in World War Two.

“The host’s response? He quickly wound up the talk, muttering that our time, as it turned out, was up suddenly, and that Sky News could not verify this information,” the diplomat wrote on Telegram on Monday.

“So much for the freedom of speech in the West… they don’t need the truth! From now on, they’ll think a hundred times before inviting Russian diplomats to a live show!”

In an interview with Sky News, Polyansky was asked whether he agreed that Russian troops in Ukraine were “dishonoring their grandfathers who fought the Nazis,” and that their actions were “mirroring fascism.”

Polyansky called the assertion “blasphemous.” He added that it was “absolutely disastrous and shameless what the UK is doing right now, forgetting everything that we were fighting [for].”

The diplomat then pulled out a tablet and showed a screenshot of a since-deleted social media post by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. On Victory Day, Zelensky published a photo of a Ukrainian fighter with a skull head patch that was worn by an elite German SS unit during the war.

When the host tried to interject, Polyansky said: “Don’t interrupt me, sir, please.”

“Do you know that this ‘Totenkopf’ division was responsible for the murder of 100 Britons in France in the beginning of the Second World War?” Polyansky continued. “So, it means that now the UK is covering Ukrainian authorities, which display Nazi symbols during the Victory Day. And these Nazi symbols were used by the same regiments that killed British people. Isn’t that a little bit strange?”

The host then said they had run out of time and ended the interview. He added that the network could not independently verify Polyansky’s claims.

The image of a fighter with the skull head patch was also posted by the Ukrainian Defense Ministry on Twitter and later removed.

Moscow previously said it had captured fighters with Nazi tattoos and insignia during its military campaign in Ukraine. According to multiple reports, Ukraine’s Azov Battalion contains fighters with openly neo-Nazi views.

https://www.rt.com/russia/555225-russian-diplomat-sky-news/

>>16251418

Thx for that, we are not a very grateful nation and its getting worse daily

>>16251393

I wish I felt Shadilay tonight or even the last 2 weeks

>>16251264

Shut up Avril I have more intelligence data reading the news, than you do! What are you using a fucking ouija board or something?

And get a makeover, you look awful.

>>16251299

We dont dox but we cant stop others. Plus they/she are trying to get a SC Justice killed.

>>16251278

Good I need that feeling tonight. Thx

>>16251295

We know, it must be brutal. Tell us more

>>16251326

Nothing shocks me these days. Thats pretty bad

>>16251359

You gotta admit they are coming out with better insults, but we embraced deplorable and enjoyed and now we are Ultra Cool. These dopes are retarded.

>>16251402

I wonder if Miley and Austin are embarrassed for having to wotk for dementia Joe, there’s no honor among thieves and liars

>>16251407

Good now you taje it away from the ones that want it to kill people

Poor misguided Elon thought he was protecting Ukrainians, it turns out he is servicing nazis

>>16251417

Seriously make one word red! no one can read paragraphs of red.

But I suspect you know this

11 May, 2022 02:37

Former Twitter CEO reacts to Musk’s plan to unban Trump

Jack Dorsey claims he is against permanent bans, with a few exceptions

Twitter co-founder said he generally “agrees” that there should not be permanent suspensions of individual users, after billionaire and newly-minted owner of the social media giant Elon Musk promised to reverse the ban on former US President Donald Trump after the acquisition is completed.

Jack Dorsey tweeted on Tesday that “generally permanent bans are a failure of ours and don't work,” listing several notable exceptions like child sexual exploitation, spam, “network manipulation” and other "illegal behavior."

However, Dorsey also quote-tweeted his statement following the January 6 riot at the Capitol, in which he had tried to explain how the controversial move to silence the US President “was the right decision” driven by “the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter.”

If folks do not agree with our rules and enforcement, they can simply go to another internet service,” he said at the time. He admitted that finding an alternative may prove to be hard “when a number of foundational internet tool providers also decided not to host what they found dangerous,” but denied the effort to silence conservative voices was in any way “coordinated.”

Trump was banned almost simultaneously from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and other mainstream social media platforms while still in office, supposedly out of concern that his tweets about alleged voter fraud in the 2020 election would pose the “risk of further incitement of violence.”

“I would reverse the permanent ban,” Elon Musk said on Tuesday at the Financial Times’ Future of the Car calling it a “morally bad decision… and foolish in the extreme,” that “alienated a large part of the country and did not ultimately result in Donald Trump not having a voice.”

Trump, however, previously insisted he would not return to Twitter even if his account, which had some 89 million followers, was reinstated, claiming he would instead stick to his own Truth Social platform.

Dorsey stepped down as Twitter’s chief executive last November after leading the company since its founding in 2006, tapping CTO Parag Agrawal to take his place. Last month Musk reached a yet-to-be-finalized deal to purchase Twitter for $44 billion, a move some users on the platform believe will herald a return to the days of more open discussion, given the Tesla tycoon’s self-professed status as a “free speech absolutist.”

(do you think @jack will ever look like a human again? Or has he gone full satanist, transhuman? Or whatever, maybe goat boy.)

https://www.rt.com/news/555279-dorsey-twitter-musk-trump-ban/

>>16251629

Now he’s fucking justifying it

>>16251557

So the Southern District of NY FBI and AG are now the mafia, again. Time for a special counsel to look into this. Durham should do this one since he prosecuted the New Englad Mafia. Maybe he can investigate Letecia James while hes at it!

NY is as bad as a swamp as DC

>>16251614

Why do you ask?

>>16251700

He’s still a bery sick goat man, no one banned biteass when he called 60% of the nation terrorists

So sick of these ficks that think they can distinguish right and wrong when they sre satsnists

>>16251652

He didnt have to ban Trump he knowingly banned either on lies and distortions or free will because all social media was doing it and he wanted to be cool