/scratches head
Scott Adams actually did block Darren J. Beattie. So why would Scott block Darren for making this observation? Doing so is an admittance that Darren is correct in his statement. So what's the motivation? Perhaps by openly admitting he agrees with Darren's point, Scott is rubbing it in the face of those that he views as being on an intellectual level that are able to be amused by his musings, but not at a level that can comprehend the irony behind why he does it. Look at this tweet, and screenshot:
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1524016352788312064
Blocked for mindreading.
Now, look at this tweet and second screenshot:
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1357370405976121349
Does this help or hurt Scott's 'brand'? Is Scott even concerned with that? It's obvious Scott is good at dissecting communication in a way many aren't even capable of perceiving. Again, he touts that he's a hypnotist, and I suspect a majority can't even understand why he'd state something like that right out in the open. He obviously knows how intelligent PDJT is, and that's where things get even more interesting.
sips covfefe
Alright, so getting to the point of the post.
Is Scott just an adept "trickster" wordsmith?
or
Is Scott fishing for a higher level of engagement?
Bonus questions:
Why was Scott invited to the White House?
Why was Scott really invited to the White House?