Government Employees leaking like a sieve because no one ever gets punished!
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1524393362601791488
Link to DOJ announcement
https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/22-073.pdf
More leaking from the SC to Politico
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1524413577037295624
Oops here's the opinion leaked
https://twitter.com/RepDanBishop/status/1524403693981941760
All GOP that voted NO on funding Ukraine
Is the GOP growing a spine?
https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1524374994654015490
If there is not enough to indict him I'd be surprised but it would be covered by political speech, 'we didn't think we could win' or some bullshit like this.
you notice now all media is using a real picture of Hunter now, instead of whatever/whoever that was before
don't you think we've gotten to a dark place when lawmakers have to write a law not to kill a newborn baby? Who would have thought?
Man the media is freaking to fuck out that twitter won't ban conservative speech, then conservatives can prove to the masses there that everything they say is a lie.
Alaska’s Special Election Is A Template For How The Left Wants To Rig The Vote
Despite bloated voter rolls and zero safeguards on absentee ballot signatures, Alaska is about to conduct an all mail-in statewide primary.
Next month, Alaskans will vote in a special primary election for the state’s single congressional seat, left vacant by the death of Republican Rep. Don Young in March. Young, the longest-serving Republican in the history of the U.S. House, was Alaska’s sole congressman for 49 years, so the election to replace him is in some ways an historic event for the state.
But it’s also historic in another way: it will be Alaska’s first ever statewide mail-in primary election. That is, there will be no in-person voting at all. Every single voter on the state’s bloated and error-riddled voter rolls was automatically mailed a blank ballot.
What’s more, there will be no verification requirements for these mail-in ballots. Voters will simply need to fill out their ballot and have a witness observe them sign the envelope. The state’s Division of Election has explicitly said it will not verify the authenticity of the signatures on the ballots.
Normally, to vote by mail in Alaska you have to submit an absentee ballot application ahead of time, which includes a signature that can be used to verify the signature on the completed ballot. But not for this special mail-in election, which is already a chaotic and confusing mess, with 48 names on the primary ballot and a new ranked-choice voting process in place that will send the top four vote-getters from the primary to the in-person general special election in August (which is on the same day as the regular statewide primary election for the November midterms).
By any measure, Alaska’s special election is a mess. But why should the rest of the country care? Because Alaska’s insane statewide mail-in election is a template for how the left wants to run elections nationwide. Democrats and left-wing activists would love nothing more than to hold elections entirely by mail with as few safeguards in place to prevent ballot fraud.
Indeed, Alaska presents a unique and in some ways ideal test case for the left. For one thing, Alaska’s voter rolls are a mess. As of 2020, voter registration was 118 percent of the estimated vote age population, meaning there were more registered voters than actual people who could vote (this problem is getting worse in Alaska; in 2018 it was only 103 percent). Making matters worse is a 2016 Alaska law that automatically registers residents to vote when they submit an application for the state’s permanent fund dividend.
If you want to make anelection less secure, you pair bloated voter rolls with mass mail-in voting and then strip all safeguards and verification requirements from the mail-in ballots, which is exactly what Alaska has done.
The state government’s weak excuse for conducting a statewide mail-in election is that, because a special election must be held within 90 days of the vacancy (in this case, Young’s death on March 18) there simply wasn’t time to hire and train the 3,000 poll workers a standard in-person election would require. But even if you buy that, the state has not yet explained why it decided to conduct the mail-in election without any mechanism to verify the authenticity of the signatures on the ballots.
On top of all this, the special primary election next month and the special general election in August will be the first election cycle in Alaska thatemploys ranked-choice voting, which voters approved in 2020.
It’s hard to imagine an election scenario more ill-suited to such a convoluted and confusing scheme than this special election, partly because voters will be choosing among an unheard of 48 candidates in the special mail-in primary election and partly because the special in-person general election will take place on the same day — and perhaps even on the same ballot — as the regular primary.
As Sarah Montalbano of the Alaska Policy Forum noted recently in the Alaska Watchman, that means “the bifurcated ballot will have both a special election chosen by [ranked-choice voting] and a general primary election instructing voters to choose only one!”
Montalbano calls Alaska’s special election a “perfect storm,” and for anyone concerned about election integrity and fairness, it certainly is a perfect storm. But foranyone who wants to make elections as unsecure and as open to fraud as possible, what’s about to happen in Alaska is ideal.
But the left never lets a crisis go to waste, which is why we’re about to see in Alaska’s special election a dry-run for what Democrats would like to do nationwide: use every trick in the book to make our elections less secure.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/11/alaskas-special-election-is-a-template-for-how-the-left-wants-to-rig-the-vote/
Who Is Kathy Barnette? The Candidate Shaking Up The Pennsylvania Senate Race
By: Tristan Justice
May 11, 2022
A new poll out Sunday found a potential new frontrunner in the crowded GOP Pennsylvania Senate primary, and it’s not the daytime television star or a former Trump official who have been neck and neck throughout the contest. It’s a political commentator running on a MAGA platform without the MAGA president’s endorsement: Kathy Barnette.
According to the survey from the Trafalgar Group, one of the most reliable pollsters of the prior two presidential elections,Barnette is tied with medical TV host Dr. Mehmet Oz, with more than 23 percent to the doctor’s less than 25 percent, within the nearly 3 percent margin of error. The Trafalgar Group surveyed 1,080 likely GOP primary voters between May 6-8, just after Barnette became a breakout candidate in the Republican Senate debate fueling a late-race surge.
“Yes, it is true. I’m black. And I’ve been black all my life, fact check it,” Barnette said on stage in one of at least two soundbites from the Newsmax-sponsored event to go viral, racking up tens of thousands of views on Twitter alone. “Black people are not special little unicorns. We want what everyone else wants. We want good schools, we want safe streets, we want good jobs. We don’t want liquor stores on every street corner… We [Republicans] have the best story to tell. The problem is we keep picking people who suck at telling it.” In another clip, Barnette touted her pro-life credentials, highlighting herself as a product of rape, conceived when her mother was only 11 years old.
“I am the byproduct of a rape,” she said. “My mother was 11-years-old when I was conceived, my father was 21. I was not just a ‘lump of cells.’ As you can see, I’m still not just a ‘lump of cells.’ My life has value.” She documented her birth story in a more than four-minute campaign ad released in September.
The debate moment came two days after abortion entered the electoral spotlight with a leaked draft opinion previewing the Supreme Court’s potential reversal of Roe v. Wade this summer.
Barnette’s surge in the polls illustrated by RealClearPolitics below, just days before the Pennsylvania Senate primary, showcases a candidacy built on grassroots campaigning with a compelling message without the advantages of a well-funded war chest deployed by her competitors.
According to Politico on Monday with data from the ad-tracking firm AdImpact, rival candidates Oz and former senior Trump Treasury officialDavid McCormick have spent $12.4 million and $11.4 million on television commercials, respectively. Barnette has only spent about $137,000, a spending ratio of 358-1 against her competitors. Yet Barnette, running without former President Donald Trump’s support while coopting his movement, is in a prime position to clinch the contest.
So who is Barnette? The political newcomer has only sought public office once before in a failed House bid for the Philadelphia-area fourth congressional district two years ago. Her star-studded rivals include two former high-level officials in the Trump administration, McCormick and Carla Sands, who was ambassador to Denmark, and the television celebrity who captured their former employer’s endorsement, Oz.
Barnette is a retired Army reservist who spent a decade in the military, enlisting when she was 18. The Senate hopeful told The Federalist her experience serving in the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) unit fundamentally shaped her perspective of law enforcement as far different from the one she’s expected to hold as a black woman. Barnette said she was the youngest in her unit by at least 20 years, and was the only black person, let alone woman, in her group.
“Police are considered bad across the board, but today as I stand my best friends are in the industry,” she said. “When I’m running out of a bad situation, they’re running into a situation.”
Barnette said she spent time in South Korea “as well as other places” over her decade of service as a reservist. She later added “author” to her resume after four years of frequent national television and radio.
Barnette’s platform is firmly conservative, with no issue standing out as more important than the other, she told The Federalist. On her website, Barnette condemns censorship, celebrates the 2nd Amendment, cherishes the right to life, deplores vaccine mandates, demands energy independence, and insists on parental input over school curriculums
“We need to be very sober about the decision we’re about to make,” Barnette said. “Fortunately, Pennsylvanians have an option and don’t have to hold their nose and vote for the lesser of two evils.”
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/11/who-is-kathy-barnette-the-candidate-shaking-up-the-pennsylvania-senate-race/
I think Trump wants Oz to lose, the strategy was to get al the revelations about Oz out there.Because he's got a lot of skeletons in this his closet.
Someone asked Posobiec if he knew why Trump was backing Oz, and the one word answer from Jack was "yes"! And Jack has been non stop attack on Oz from the beginning with a lot of other journalists.
Some say, I love Trump but he's making a mistake with Oz….
Just like we had to figure out what Trump was touting the jab, we can figure this out; one of the main reasons you have to make a choice is, we have our own mind and reasons!
We cannot treat POTUS like Jesus. He's not Jesus, and we cannot we fall into idol worshiping.
As researchers and having our own mind and opinion is the reason why Q showed up in the first place.
Make up your own mind and stick with it.
Don't vote for someone you can't stand, I felt dirty when I voted for McCain, but I sure as hell wasn't to vote for O.
Now you've got a choice Barnett