>>16255003 (PB)

>FIAT paper is at least a bit of paper

less and less every day

$2.1 trillion in physical federal reserve notes in circulation (US Dollars)

$250 trillion on global private wealth" held in US dollars

125 : 1

nonphysical currency : physical currency

>The value of global private wealth grew annually since, despite the global pandemic caused by the coronavirus in 2020, reaching a value of around 250 trillion U.S. dollars in 2020.

>https://www.statista.com/statistics/321982/private-wealth-selected-regions-worldwide/#:~:text=The%20value%20of%20global%20private,trillion%20U.S.%20dollars%20in%202020.

kek

>>16255048

>What happened to the posts?

which posts anon?

probably deleted because they were spam

pic related

>>16255052

>NOT SPAM

confirmed

it wasnt posed by OSS

it wasnt identidied by anons as possibly Flash

it wasnt critical of board censorship

it did not mention the Jews

it did not mention Jim

hence

NOT SPAM

>>16255060

>Even non-life threatening injuries now require amputations in order to prevent the wounded succumbing to sepsis.

so

much

winning

>>16255070

>how do they handle the stump from an amputation with no bandages?

Alex, I'll takecauterizationfor $500

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauterization

>>16255097

>gotta cut the thing off first. uh huh

maximum pain = maximum empathy

its clearly spellcraft going on

>>16255147

>go to peoples home

>go to their places of worship

>make them uncomfortable

>this is not time for civility

>Rosenberg

fucking

shocked

>>16255153

>deviant group on the right?

if one exists

everyone in it is probably ugly as hell

>>16255173

>Who and wtf is this?

KEK

good question

def a dude

>>16255258

>yet ebots shit stays and eats up all the bread

>This is getting pretty stupid

this is why the "spam" defense is so utterly retarded

you cant absolutely define SPAM

its "usage" is so loose that literally ANYTHING can just be labelled spam

and thus we have the unequal application principle

if we are going to "delete spam"

that means ALL spam

thus

management opens themselves up to criticism in every single bread as "spam" gets by their banhammer

sometimes the "spam" that gets deleted is genuinly categorized as such

sometimes the "spam" will literally be wrongthink that has been classified as 'verboten' by the admins

its not a good qualifier/ classification to use for the deletion of posts

posts should only be deleted in the case of actual illegality (US Code)

>>16255306

>They'll just come right back

no anon

its not that it is aggrivating that this particular case of "spam" is not getting deleted

its aggrivating that board management has decided they will delete certain types of posts under the classification of "spam"

its aggrivating because of how much other OBVIOUS spam is left un deleted

while (perhaps unpopular) opinions are being deleted (as spam) becuase of the content of the message

its ridiculous

>>16255336

>Even chit chat posts are deleted.

>It’s odd.

agreed

and the fact that the META thread has been closed because of said "spam" is even MORE odd

>>16255233

>Now it’s gone.

>>16255367

>nothing should get lost UNLESS there is a spammer who is doing a mix of spam and shitposting and the shitposts get deleted with the spam (everything from same ip).

board log should say

all posts from IP deleted

right?

pic related is the last 4 hours from the board logs

just cap'd

>>16255386

>Anon doesn’t keep track- but it certainly was here. I had to post “PB” because it was in reference to a pic in the last bread.

>It wasn’t important to anyone but me.

this is why we need some kind of "trash bin" for deleted posts

now there is no way to confirm or deny

plenty of posts were deleted in the time frame being referenced

but there is no way to confirm what was actually deleted unless someone was saving caps of the bread every few minutes and can make a comparison

this is why deletions should be a LAST resort measure

only used for illegal content

>>16255423

>plenty of posts were deleted in the time frame being referenced

check the board log for yourself:

>https://sys.8kun.top/log.php?board=qresearch

or review the CAP here: >>16255390

>>16255398

>Ok what are you exactly talking about?

this is the OP I was orriginally replying to

in this conversation: >>16255052

the actual example being used as "OBVIOUS spam" that was not deleted:

>>16254640 (PB)

>ID: 0c125e

>snot rockets for red rockets follow yellow cake road for goldamn teabagging sachs

snot rockets for red rockets follow yellow cake road for goldamn teabagging sachs

is that interesting to some anons?

>>16255409

>There must be a rational explanation.

the ration explanation

based on the timeline

is that the post(s) you are referencing

that were deleted

were deleted byBVBirdMan as indicated in the board log

the reason why?

if I am going to go with the "low hanging fruit"

it was a misclick

meant to delete the post right above/below the ones you now notice as gone

but accidentially deleted the wrong post

that is ENTIRELY possible

and would be the 'occums razor' answer until we have more evidence/ information

>>16255513

>You may not like that

…..

my position is that NO "spam" should be deleted

deletion should be reserved for illegal content (US Code)

>>16255543

>that got this captcha shit started

does it work?

did it stop the word salads?

CATCHA hell! was a good thing now?

>>16255543

>welcome newfag

I dont recall the battle of captcha hill ending with a universal love an acceptance for the captcha that saved /qresearch/ anon

>>16255554

>Do you like seeing [insert example]

its not about what I like to see anon

its about an un-edited recored of WHAT HAPPENED

>There is zero value in that

>and that's also not protected by free speech

that just like

your 'pinion man

>>16255588

>[CAPTCHA]

>who said it was a good thing

>IT SUCKS

….okay….

>deleting & banning spammers seems much better than captcha

then why do we havebothcaptchas and deletion/banning of spammer?

if one is better than the other

then you do the BETTER one

right?

>>16255598

>anon likes the captcha

>>16255638

>you don't want that cleaned up

correct

stop "cleaning up" the bread

that is exactly what I am saying

>Maybe even no bans?

do they fucking work?

no they dont

so why do it

you just end up with collateral damage hitting anons who end up with the same IP as the banned ones when ISP's re-allocate new IP addresses to customers

so it doesnt work

AND

it has collateral damage against innocent anons

so yeah

no fucking bans either

>>16255671

>If you still think they are deleting "spam" then you are a fucking retard and there is no hope for you. They are deleting what jews always delete. Research.

I am engaging in reason based logical debate for the benefit of anons

I abso-fucking-lutely know they are not deleting LEGITIMATE "spam"

that is why I and other anons are point out all of the LEGITIMATE "spam" that is NOT getting deleted

while actual research and even basic "chit chat" between anons IS being deleted

under the cover of "thats SPAM"

which is why "spam" should not be used a classification for deletion

deletion should be a last resort

reserved for illegal content (US Code)

>>16255682

>we could start the captcha wars back up tho

I mean

sounds fun to me

>>16255695

>Who are you?

are you fucking serious?

check the namefield faggot

>>16255726

based

>>16255758

>DEFINE SPAM

THIS

without an official definition from management this is a giant rhetorical circle jerk

>>16255763

chek'd and fucking kek'd anon