Twitter deal temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users
Incestimated.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1525049369552048129
Twitter (Inc estimated)
Musk has Intel that spam/bots are GREATER than 5%?
Just how many bots does it have?
God bless you and keep you from harm, this day and forever.
God bless you and keep you from harm, this day and forever.
Kek, they can't stop contradicting themselves.
I see some people are dishonestly deflecting from Barnette's racist and sexist rant.
Nah, he's dismantling the cesspool and bringing its valuation to pennies by bringing the heat to those who lied about hoe many bots there really are.
"It's not my fault I approved turning Twitter into a bot farm. It's the two party system and muh world mind." - jack
Moran, Jim Baker is a cooperating witness who is taking a deal.
How else did you think they have evidence Baker was lied to by Sussman?
What's Barnette retweeting#BLM hashtag?
Didn't 'Spicer' just claim no support?
Baker had to CONFIRM he received that email and confirm what Sussman wrote to him.
See
What's Barnette doing retweeting #BLM and #DefundthePolice?
Why did 'Lavern Spicer' POST DISINFO of 'not a BLM supporter'?
>We need to stop using their language to categorize.
This only reinforces the notion 'they' control all word definitions.
Why are you presuming that 'King' must mean what 'they' say?
Part of the Great Awakening is realizing that the whole notion word MEANINGS are NOT the property of specific people who for reasons unknown are the standard.
By criticizing the free speech of people this way, the underlying presumption is that the meaning of words is not the choices of anyone EXCEPT 'them'. If we wee the word 'King', we're all supposed to 'think' how 'they' want us to think.
And now you're echoing it trying to shut people down.
Here's a tip.
The word 'King' is in chess too. Ever thought of that?
Ever consider that the meaning of 'tyrant' does not apply when a person uses it to have a meaning unlike the one you're demanding we all be limited to?
That nobody can communicate a sarcasm, a mockery of Biden who said it, and jumping on the opportunity to say it to trigger the right people?
It's 'King is defined by the elite monarchical Kings and nobody else'?
Trump's movement IS THE PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT.
Trump is in 'their' way.
When Biden THOUGHT he mocked Trump as 'MAGA KING', the meaning of the term as Biden used it is as what BIDEN wanted it to mean in that instance. That Trump is a 'tyrant'.
When Trump uses it, the meaning of the term is NOT Biden's, but Trump's, and Trump's Presidency is bringing the power of government AND INFORMATION back to the people.
When Trump mocks Biden back by accepting the title, the meaning IS DIFFERENT, it is that the People can use it with the meaning of 'King' as THEY use it, which is MOCKING BIDEN. It's a 'Let's Go Brandon' style meme.
Words matter yes.
Knowing that word meanings are open source matters more.
>using them just to get eyes on
Hahahahahaha
Using them to promote them.
July 2020 Barnette was all pro BLM, pro RIOT, anti-White, 'systematic racism', blah blah.
But, Anons knew already.
Barnette's #1 fan on 8kun wants everyone to believe that supporting a racist group of rioters by retweeting #BLM #DefundThePolice is not support after all but merely wanting people to have eyes on it.
Kmao
Anon senses a plan at work.
It's a tiny step to MSM
Same pattern in narrative.
Anon sees something amazing at work.
Millions and millions are going to awaken once they realize that the world they thought was 'representative' of people, was all along an algorithm to brainwash them.
Oh this is gonna be good.
Tapper script writer begging for, threatening with, nuclear strike?
Meanwhile, at NWO headquarters, they're realizing this morning that the world's population is realizing they're external to a narrative they used to trust was from within themselves.
HELLO NWO, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE WORLD LEARNS THE DIALECTIC OF DIVISION IS NOTHING BUT AN ALGO?
God bless you and keep you from harm, this day and forever.
We will always have an infinite supply of unique prime numbers to code any system no matter how many additional axioms and theorems are added to it, and we will always be gifted with the opportunity to know of true statements about the system that the algo system itself cannot, and we will always be able to identify one inconsistency in a system purporting to be 'complete' and bring the whole inconsistent system down.
Mathematical logic is unassailable.