>>16267628

>>16267628

>>16267628

Problems money has:

-Scarcity

-Unethical practices (ie ursury).

-Fallacy of "there being no other way" of doing this

-Debt

-Lack of controls via public representation

-Interest

Solutions Needed:

-Provide a monetary system that can seamlessly provide for basic needs for each individual, as well as allow for a competitive market for ideas/businesses to thrive in order to supplement wealth and steer growth/progress.

Resources available to accommodate:

-Energy production

-Intra and international trade

-Exchange of goods/services (labor and products, essentially) at the individual and business level

The hardest part would be the transition, and subsequent public buy-in, right? How do you implement a new/better/humanitarian solution to the problem of 'money' without pissing off those that have accumulated their current level of wealth and also get them to buy in on a new system that actually provides an expansive, adaptive model for humanity? The current system of money reinforces the worst in human nature. That system can never pull humanity out of the depths of hell. Money is the ultimate system of division faggotry. There will never be a complete awakening without a system that permits humans to be their own selves. How can the current system be restructured to be a resource that promotes growth; both in terms of population and ingenuity?

>>16267611

Bigger picture:

So the long/short of this is Dinesh was offered a Fox-curated 45 second spot to feature snippets of his (now multi-million dollar grossing) film and instead of taking it for what it was worth and letting Catherine run with it on air, he and Salem decided it wasn't enough famefagging, and pitched a fit and burned bridges over 45 additional seconds of footage without a guarantee that the name of the film would not be mentioned; all while putting Catherine in a very uncomfortable position to have to deal with working with Tucker's production crew?

Well, as they say, "There's no such thing as bad publicity", I suppose.

https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1525102708725796864

If you want to see how abusively @TuckerCarlson

and his @FoxNews

team deal with people, read this thread. It's an exchange between me and Tucker's executive producer @justinbwells

>>16267877

It was a detailed account of "how" in 1.5 hours of easy-to-watch media. In a world where media is king, kingly media makes for a larger court.

>>16267891

>would you trust fox with editing your material?

If Fox truly had the intentions to trying to edit the media to make it look like a Fox collaboration, they'd be sued into oblivion. Dinesh made the assumption that the title of the movie would not be mentioned (read the response he got from the VP), and that 45 seconds of the 90 second clip would be used to state the case that True the Vote had a good account on how a majority of the theft happened. Dinesh doesn't look good in this exchange.

How many patriots have had interviews with Tucker that they've walked away from saying "That was a huge mistake, and Tucker's team made me out to look like an ass"? So why would Dinesh choose to do this? Either 1. He's just ginning up noise to promote the film or 2. He's really petty. The accusation from Dinesh is that Fox wanted to "last minute edit the submitted trailer". The responses he's getting from Justin make it look like Dinesh should've had an idea, already, that edits were to be expected. I do suspect there's more to the conversation.