Anonymous ID: 4d96ff May 14, 2022, 2:31 a.m. No.16272014   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2100 >>2248 >>2261

Early morning departure from JBA

SPAR19 USAF C-40B departed JBA ne

Special Priority Air Resource after a an overnight-inbound from Scott AFB, IL

ZOMBI11 USAF KC-135 tanker heading to set up at the empty callsign Joe position 'at' Delaware

Cap#2 from yesterday reporting Joe 'went to Delaware'

https://factba.se/biden/calendar

Anonymous ID: 4d96ff May 14, 2022, 3:07 a.m. No.16272098   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2112

>>16272076

It's moar a question of lack of book depth to sell in to.

There just isn't any liquidity so they are all stuck.

Yesterday was Janet pushing the ESF 'up' button cause it's a Friday and they don't want to the give the talking heads the weekend to talk about what habbened in the prior four days

They, FRB, but not Jerry's branch, the NYFRB push out almost $2t everyday to keep them from crashing

It's too much leverage and nowhere to unload it so each time you see early morning spikes they get sold into hard.

You've got Tiger Global being liquidated, Softbank and the $27B loss-which was seen over the last few weeks being dumped in huge billion shares blocks on the NAS

Not to mention the BTC/UST transaction where the idiot at Terra that took that swap either din't understand what he was getting into with Blackrock and Citadel or knew and was paidto be stoopid.

Anonymous ID: 4d96ff May 14, 2022, 3:19 a.m. No.16272136   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2151

>>16272112

agree with the first part of that but this is really nothing (yet)-all pretty orderly as the 'bots make sure the circuit breaers don't get tripped ans then the masses really start to notice.

>that it made the soft landing possible.

this is whre I disagree-they never fixed anything from the 2008 event and you now have $158T in OTC derivatives not to mention all the off bookd stuff so we're probably looking at a few Quadrillion WW and there is gong to be to nothing soft about that.

Wall St has this problem of not allowing the consequences of an already achieved result so it's picking winners/losers by decree.

You don't want a soft landing because that will keep this shitty, over-leveraged system intact

It needs to die and the only way is an implosion and let the pieces fall where they may-but that also doesn't mean it drops too

If it drops they just rebuy it and we are going to be here much longer.

It can be blown up-to the upside as well sp keep taht in mind

But a soft-landing keeps this system intact

Not what our soceity needs

It needs to get shitty so it is wiped clean and that means people are going to get hurt-I don't want that as much as the next rationale person but it needs to habben

Anonymous ID: 4d96ff May 14, 2022, 3:37 a.m. No.16272197   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2237

>>16272179

>and it's WAY MORE complex than it ever needed to be

That is completely true and done that way on purpose so everyone 'goes to the tv" to have it explained to them-worst thing you can do.

The way they have it levered now is probably 30-40x worse than 2008 and if it 'pops' off it will make that look like a church picnic.

Once you understand the language they use it's really not that complex but that is a huge barrier to most and why they have so much control

Good luck as you've taken steps that 90% of people do not do with this-you're own research so you can make your own decisions.

They leave it up to the 'expurts' and only care when it drops-too late by then

o7