>>16272629 LB

Can any anon dig with access to Scientific American archives when it was still more or less scientific and not politicised…can look for a monthly extra monthly addition talking about synthetic oestrogen and the packing industry (cause of synthetic oestrogen) around 1985-1990?? were concerns were that sperm count could fall to as low as 11 (?) percent but..but TPTB thought muh duh packing industry the 11th industry globally cud not possibly take that hit. Excellent video but not mentioning the packaging and its plastic implications for sperm…think toothpaste, hair and body products, packed food products etc etc etc …we r fucking losing our males ffs!

Old anon who wish had warned earlier…