>>16280031 (lb)

True knowledge comes from discovery. How determined are you to answer your own questions? Giving people the choice to discover the Truth for their own selves is the ultimate expression of the belief in free will. Truth is only observed by a person at the intersection of subjective expression and objective fact on the platform of free speech. Until the observer chooses Truth over cognitive bias, the cycle persists. Forcing the Truth on those unwilling or unprepared will cause any/all progress made to revert; sometimes to a worse place than where they started from. This is why so much information is being controlled. Those that were in control of information before are being cornered into a position where everything they say seems ludicrous to the observer, and the rare slippage of Truth is amplified. One step at a time, together, for humanity's sake.

It's quite brilliant if you can take a step back to realize it.

>>16280145

There's nothing F&G about 65% off.

>>16280215

>>16280225

>Freedom and control are opposite poles.

Freedom and control are in constant conflict. Some conflicts are brutal, and some are in the realm if the mind. If WWIII is to be fought in the mind (and it is), then it's a battle against one's own self. Demanding those that are assisting with revelation participate on your terms demonstrates a lack of understanding the scope of those affected. and the real nature of the conflict at hand. Secrecy is repugnant, sure, but discovery is light. Be a "child of light", as they say, and never stop pushing forward.

>>16280267

1. World is programmed to a false reality

2. Anon makes case that ripping the plug out would cause 90% of the subjects to "plug their selves back in", and possibly install a pad lock to ensure it stays plugged in, so the Truth must be discovered organically for maximal effect and safety.

3. You think that if everyone that's in the know would simply lock arms, and force the guilty to lock arms with them, and join in a unison chorus to profess the full truth, everything would be okie dokie.

4. Anon proposes rational explanation why this would casue #2.

5. Your argument morphs into "hasn't been tried yet, so fuck it; let's go"

6. Also say "everything's been a system of control for forever".

7. The real scope is the entire world, actually.

So, you've done an "ok" job at trying to rationalize nowfaggotry, but the problem with your arguments are they dodged every reason why that'd be a shit idea. So instead of addressing them direction, you're rewording your argument to appear fresh.

Also, I'll point out that people communicate Truth in different ways. The real message behind language used by a speaker can be a difficult thing to decipher if you are listening for something (cognitive bias/perception) you want to hear. Instead with notions, dissect each word from a range of perspectives. You might find that that words they speak have the Truth "in your face" without having previously realized it.