>>16280380 (pb)

>>16280406 (pb)

Thank you for the input.

It looks like a nato spec platform for the 5.56 calls for 1:7 twist which may help explain the slower velocity over a .223 with a 1:8 or 1:9 twist. The claim for reason of 1:7 ratio for 5.56 is because that is the optimal ratio for tracer rounds. I can’t see that being the only reason for the desired rifling ratio and will look more into the stopping power of 1:7 vs 1:9.

Thanks again.

>>16281156

Nothing.

If this comes as a surprise at this point in the game, you haven’t been paying attention.

How would this effect a country under devolution?

>>16281166

From what I read briefly, the 5.57 has much higher chamber pressure but overall velocity lower.

https://www.sportsmans.com/5-56-vs-223-cartridge

>>16281300

>>16281323

Great input, sorry for the distraction. Also I agree it seems the site I briefly read has it bass ackwards.