Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 7:29 a.m. No.1629078   🗄️.is đź”—kun

You lie more and more

Clinging to control

But each lie adds weight

You need free acceptance

But you keep lying

Which kills freedom

Thus, you're in a death spiral

Go to sleep

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 7:34 a.m. No.1629109   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9180

>>1629086

It's a game. Bad, fake bans, demoralize real anons, then, additionally -→ "okay guys, you complained, so no bans at all!", then -→ bots/shills run wild… Then rinsed and repeated. Already done this whole dance multiple times…

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 7:52 a.m. No.1629236   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1629202

How do you know the "mess ups" aren't systematic?

 

Are the clowns trying hard to stop us? How?

 

Are we vigilant? Did clowns control previous Q boards (4chan, etc)? Still trying? What is stopping them?

 

Would a colluding BO be a HUGE benefit to clown efforts at control and undermining?

 

USE LOGIC

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 7:57 a.m. No.1629270   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1629215

How do you know that?

 

What if he knew he couldn't get a board free from clown meddling? What would he do?

 

What if the free will choice of anons to reject the clown meddling is ESSENTIAL in ways that aren't immediately evident?

 

Would clowns want a controlled BO? Does vigilance thus DICTATE that we should vet?

 

If you're clean, why don't you just show that normally, instead of being hostile, and banning anons that care (while obvious garbage clogs each bread).

 

Please stop banning humans and act like a normal person. This isn't a game.

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 8 a.m. No.1629289   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9306

>>1629266

What do you think this shows? Explain the actual logic behind this kind of "collecting", and the fact that BO– in a position of unusual importance– refuses to address basic questions about his own vetting? What does that show?

 

It hardly makes much sense. This isn't a game.

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 8:07 a.m. No.1629330   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9355 >>9468 >>9646

>>1629306

 

Where did Q say he vetted?

 

Are the clowns trying to control the internet, or not?

 

Would the clowns LOVE to have a controlled BO, or not?

 

If the clowns keep trying to control this board, what are the results of their activity? Why do we see none?

 

What address the clowns ding with their supercomputers?

 

What is wikileaks vault 7?

 

What are the clowns doing with their vast penetration of every computing platform?

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 8:15 a.m. No.1629392   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9406

>>1629355

What if there is a reason Q isn't DIRECTING us what to do? What if our FREE WILL is the key?

"ANONS KNOW WHAT TO DO"

 

V

E

R

T

I

C

A

L text? Why?

So many "anons" claim to chit chat with BO IRL, but BO is absolutely cagey as can be when questioned.. But why would he be? Ego? No. This isn't a game. This isn't business as usual. If BO is cagey, and extremely hostile toward anons' questions about vetting, logic suggests its not coincidence…

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 8:20 a.m. No.1629422   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9535

>>1629386

Do you at least understand why anons are concerned? Do you think your hostility to questions about your vetting are appropriate? Isn't it moor important to unite the community with transparency than create conflict through banning and hostility?

 

Your position is very key. We can only assume the clowns have tried to get to you… Have they? How do you stay secure? What is the most scared you've been?

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 8:44 a.m. No.1629564   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9604 >>9615

>>1629542

BO, delete this bot's posts please.

 

One theory is that it posts openly for symbolic/memetic/tacit-consent-control reasons. When its posts are allowed to remain, it "empowers" the enemy we're fighting. Fighting back with whatever tools we have is key.

 

Thanks

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 8:55 a.m. No.1629657   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9661 >>9662

>>1629624

Well, in fairness, what other option does one have if it so happens that there are instances of bot-type behavior that like observes? What would you do in such a case?

 

It's one thing to fail to be vigilant. It's quite another to ACTIVELY OPPOSE it.

Anonymous ID: 512d2f June 4, 2018, 9:03 a.m. No.1629719   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1629685

Right now, we have to focus on fighting them.. The subsequent spiritual stance towards their souls has to deferred to later.

 

Sympathy for evil will be exploited. While every human can be redeemed, it can't happen during a fight like this. You're only trying to sap our strength to fight (not that it would really work).