Wendy's going to bend the knee when Tulsi becomes PDJT's VP pick.
If you are "Life begins at the moment of rape", then you've got some issues you need to sort out. Heartbeat bills are the right way to address the issue. Letting the states decide on the timing of those is the constitutional way to address it. Annually, ~32k rapes end in pregnancy (reported, not total, mind you). That's 32 thousand reasons females should have final say-so over what happens to their bodies.
>Look at this incredibly staged pic of Tulsi doing a triangle thingy with her hands
>Ben garrison cartoon!
>ZOMG Wendy chimes in! Checkmate atheists!
Meanwhile everything out of Tulsi's mouth is essentially MAGA. LtCol in the US Mil. First to speak with Assad after DJT is elected. Silenced and essentially blacklisted in her own party after owning every Dem in the primaries. Wendy like playing the heel from time to time.
It's not up to (you) to decide who's lying and who's not. Sorry, if daughteranon got drugged/gangraped at a party, anon would be the first to help her figure out what she wants to do next.
It's interesting to know just how many anons are entirely incapable to seeing something from someone else's perspective. If you think heartbeat bills are "a bridge too far", then you might just have authoritarian ideations.
>Promoting rape babies is ultra maga!
Awesome.
The abortion debate is argued from each side in the most dishonest way imaginable. Nobody has legally defined when life starts. Until that argument is settled, any debate over abortion comes down to a bodily autonomy debate. States that are passing heartbeat bills are at least trying to put forth honest/fair solutions to the problem.
OK, but it's not up to you to decide who is lying and who isn't. Heartbeat bills that give women a window of time to rights over their own body for unwanted pregnancies are as just of a solution as possible. You can't control who uses what door for what reasons, and frankly, it really is none of your business. Life, Liberty, pursuit of Happiness doesn't imply "Other people can't do what I don't want them too because I think they are willingly worshiping an entity they've likely never even heard of". Sometimes, rape happens. Rape has nothing to do with God. Interpretive mythology shouldn't be writing laws. Reasonable, logical people should be writing laws.
Women who are raped regret not being able to stop their attacker. As a consequence some of them also have to deal with an unwanted, life altering outcome in more ways than one. You don't get to make that decision for them. Also:
Isn't that the truth? There are people that will use sky daddy interpretations to rule over everyone until the end of time. It doesn't make them right. It's just an outward admittance they are too low IQ to come up with an argument outside of "muh authoritative source of morality".
>So a child conceived during rape is less worthy of life?
Define when life begins.
It's obvious you have absolutely no regard for bodily autonomy, and that's OK. It's your right to have that viewpoint. Provide anon with a logical argument that proves your viewpoint has dominion over someone else's body. You can't. Every argument that comes from the "at conception" crowd will be based on religious leanings. Every argument that comes from the "3rd trimester+" crowd will come from people who have little to no regard for life.
-
Laws that rule murder of pregnant women a "double homicide" are put in place to put maximum punishment on offenders.
-
Conception = Life is a religious argument. Our laws are (and should always remain) secular.
-
As another stated, nearly half of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. God is the biggest abortionist there is.
-
Chart attached is the common sense way to start a legal debate over when life begins, and how abortion laws should be governed for everyone that isn't a religulous authoritarian, or a rabid pro-abortinist.
Be careful, you might accidentally reveal to them which god they've been worshiping all their lives without them knowing it.